Atom E3825 vs A4-1200

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-1200
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.23
Atom E3825
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.24
+4.3%

Atom E3825 outperforms A4-1200 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-1200 and Atom E3825 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31723164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAtom
Power efficiency5.443.79
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)8 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$73

Detailed specifications

A4-1200 and Atom E3825 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1 GHz1.33 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-1200 and Atom E3825 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-1200 and Atom E3825. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-1200 and Atom E3825 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-1200 and Atom E3825. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8180Intel HD Graphics

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-1200 0.23
Atom E3825 0.24
+4.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-1200 369
Atom E3825 378
+2.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 0.24
Integrated graphics card 0.36 0.77
Recency 23 May 2013 8 October 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 6 Watt

A4-1200 has 50% lower power consumption.

Atom E3825, on the other hand, has a 4.3% higher aggregate performance score, 113.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A4-1200 and Atom E3825.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-1200 and Atom E3825, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-1200
A4-1200
Intel Atom E3825
Atom E3825

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 40 votes

Rate A4-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Atom E3825 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-1200 or Atom E3825, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.