A4-3320M vs Atom E3825
Aggregate performance score
A4-3320M outperforms Atom E3825 by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3497 | 3311 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Atom | AMD A-Series |
| Power efficiency | 1.55 | 0.46 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-I (2013) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 8 October 2013 (12 years ago) | 20 December 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $73 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Atom E3825 and A4-3320M: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 228 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E3825 and A4-3320M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1170 | FS1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3825 and A4-3320M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E3825 and A4-3320M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3825 and A4-3320M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.22 | 0.38 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.72 | 0.61 |
| Recency | 8 October 2013 | 20 December 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 35 Watt |
Atom E3825 has 18% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, a 45% more advanced lithography process, and 483% lower power consumption.
A4-3320M, on the other hand, has a 73% higher aggregate performance score.
The AMD A4-3320M is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom E3825 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
