Atom E3825 vs A4-3305M

Place in the ranking	2917	3175
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD A-Series	Atom
Power efficiency	1.26	3.77
Architecture codename	Llano (2011−2012)	Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date	14 June 2011 (13 years ago)	8 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$73

Detailed specifications

A4-3305M and Atom E3825 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	1.9 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.5 GHz	1.33 GHz
L1 cache	128K (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512K (per core)	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	22 nm
Die size	228 mm²	no data
Number of transistors	1,178 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on A4-3305M and Atom E3825 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FS1	Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3305M and Atom E3825. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3305M and Atom E3825 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3305M and Atom E3825. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare

AMD Radeon HD 6480G (593 MHz)

Intel HD Graphics

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3305M 0.47
+95.8%

Atom E3825 0.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-3305M 751
+98.7%

Atom E3825 378

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.47	0.24
Integrated graphics card	0.66	0.77
Recency	14 June 2011	8 October 2013
Chip lithography	32 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	6 Watt

A4-3305M has a 95.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom E3825, on the other hand, has 16.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The A4-3305M is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3825 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3305M and Atom E3825, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.