A4-9120C vs Atom E3825

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom E3825
2013, $73
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.22

A4-9120C outperforms Atom E3825 by a whopping 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34973176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAtomAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.553.59
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-I (2013)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date8 October 2013 (12 years ago)6 January 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$73no data

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Atom E3825 and A4-9120C: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.33 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64 KB (per core)160 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom E3825 and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA1170BGA
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3825 and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E3825 and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3825 and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD GraphicsAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom E3825 0.22
A4-9120C 0.51
+132%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom E3825 378
Samples: 10
A4-9120C 875
+131%
Samples: 36

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 0.51
Integrated graphics card 0.72 1.06
Recency 8 October 2013 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm

Atom E3825 has a 27% more advanced lithography process.

A4-9120C, on the other hand, has a 132% higher aggregate performance score, 47% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 5 years.

The AMD A4-9120C is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom E3825 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Atom E3825 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 102 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom E3825 and A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.