Core i7-2840QM vs A10-5750M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A10-5750M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads
1.41
Core i7-2840QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads
2.48
+75.9%

Core i7-2840QM outperforms A10-5750M by 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing A10-5750M and Core i7-2840QM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20851635
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core i7
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 June 2013 (10 years ago)4 September 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$198 no data

Technical specs

A10-5750M and Core i7-2840QM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 5 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2216 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1160 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-5750M and Core i7-2840QM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFS1r2Socket G2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5750M and Core i7-2840QM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1866 Controllerno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A10-5750M and Core i7-2840QM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5750M and Core i7-2840QM are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5750M and Core i7-2840QM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.598 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8650GIntel HD Graphics 3000

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5750M 1.41
i7-2840QM 2.48
+75.9%

Core i7-2840QM outperforms A10-5750M by 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-5750M 2174
i7-2840QM 3842
+76.7%

Core i7-2840QM outperforms A10-5750M by 77% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.41 2.48
Integrated graphics card 1.36 0.66
Recency 1 June 2013 4 September 2011
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

The Core i7-2840QM is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-5750M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5750M and Core i7-2840QM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5750M
A10-5750M
Intel Core i7-2840QM
Core i7-2840QM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 244 votes

Rate A10-5750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5750M or Core i7-2840QM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.