RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
2020
28 Watt
4.55

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by a whopping 919% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking61963
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeAD107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (3 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482816
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1450 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data187.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
CUDAno data8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−900%
170−180
+900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 9−10
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 10−11
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 8−9
Far Cry 5 0−1 10−11
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Hitman 3 0−1 10
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−1250%
27
+1250%
Metro Exodus 0−1 7−8
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−950%
21
+950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 9−10
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 3−4
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 10−11
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 8−9
Far Cry 5 0−1 10−11
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Hitman 3 0−1 9−10
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Metro Exodus 0−1 7−8
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−1600%
17
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1400%
15
+1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 9−10
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 3−4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 10−11
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 8−9
Far Cry 5 0−1 10−11
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−1500%
16
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 8
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 8−9
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 6−7

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 7−8
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 0−1 7−8
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 7−8
Hitman 3 0−1 9−10
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 10−11
Metro Exodus 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 4−5
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 2−3

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 8−9

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 3−4
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 3−4
Hitman 3 0−1 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 5−6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 3−4
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 3−4
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 5−6
Metro Exodus 0−1 6−7
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 5−6

This is how UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.55 46.35
Recency 15 August 2020 12 February 2024
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 70 Watt

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 425 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 11 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.