Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Place in the ranking	670	198
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	53.94
Architecture	Gen. 12 (2021−2023)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	AD107
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	2048
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz	2025 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	129.6
Floating-point processing power	no data	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	4 GB
Memory bus width	no data	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX 12_1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 4.31

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.26
+532%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 3322

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+509%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 2493

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+467%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−525%

100−110
+525%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	11 −491%	65−70 +491%
Battlefield 5	18 −511%	110−120 +511%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Far Cry 5	14 −507%	85−90 +507%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −530%	170−180 +530%
Hitman 3	16 −525%	100−105 +525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −521%	180−190 +521%
Red Dead Redemption 2	13 −515%	80−85 +515%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −514%	270−280 +514%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9 −511%	55−60 +511%
Battlefield 5	16 −525%	100−105 +525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Far Cry 5	13 −515%	80−85 +515%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −530%	170−180 +530%
Hitman 3	12 −525%	75−80 +525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −521%	180−190 +521%
Metro Exodus	6 −483%	35−40 +483%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4 −500%	24−27 +500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −488%	100−105 +488%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −514%	270−280 +514%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Battlefield 5	15 −500%	90−95 +500%
Far Cry 5	12 −525%	75−80 +525%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −530%	170−180 +530%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −488%	100−105 +488%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −514%	270−280 +514%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Hitman 3	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −471%	40−45 +471%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −471%	40−45 +471%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −530%	170−180 +530%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Hitman 3	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 525% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.31	27.26
Recency	30 March 2021	26 February 2024
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 532.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.