Radeon R7 250E vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Place in performance ranking	610	634
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.11
Architecture	Gen. 12 (2021)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	Cape Verde
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	11 May 2021 (2 years ago)	20 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$109
Current price	no data	$599 (5.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	512
Core clock speed	350 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	25.60
Floating-point performance	no data	819.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and Radeon R7 250E compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	1 GB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	72 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 4.71
+10%

R7 250E 4.28

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms Radeon R7 250E by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 2495
+26.6%

R7 250E 1970

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms Radeon R7 250E by 27% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	17 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
1440p	30 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
4K	12 +20%	10−12 −20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+11.1%

9−10
−11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	11 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Battlefield 5	18 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	14 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	14 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
Hitman 3	16 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	13 +30%	10−11 −30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	13 +30%	10−11 −30%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Battlefield 5	16 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	13 +30%	10−11 −30%
Far Cry New Dawn	13 +30%	10−11 −30%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
Hitman 3	12 +20%	10−11 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	11 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	15 +25%	12−14 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	12 +20%	10−11 −20%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Hitman 3	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Hitman 3	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1