HD Graphics 5500 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and HD Graphics 5500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.72
+215%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking613933
Place by popularitynot in top-10075
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.06
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021)Gen. 8 Broadwell (2014−2015)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeBroadwell GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)5 January 2015 (9 years ago)
Current priceno data$410

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3224
Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data22.80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and HD Graphics 5500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x1

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno data64/128 Bit
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkanno data1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 4.72
+215%
HD Graphics 5500 1.50

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 3168
+224%
HD Graphics 5500 979

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 224% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 13644
+184%
HD Graphics 5500 4798

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 184% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 2495
+276%
HD Graphics 5500 663

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 276% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 15716
+183%
HD Graphics 5500 5544

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 183% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 112966
+92.2%
HD Graphics 5500 58776

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 92% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p40−45
+208%
13
−208%
Full HD17
+70%
10
−70%
1440p25
+257%
7−8
−257%
4K12
+300%
3−4
−300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+173%
11
−173%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
Hitman 3 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70
+195%
22
−195%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+200%
9
−200%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
Hitman 3 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45
+186%
14
−186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
Hitman 3 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Metro Exodus 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Metro Exodus 0−1 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and HD Graphics 5500 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 208% faster in 900p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 70% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 257% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 300% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.72 1.50
Recency 11 May 2021 5 January 2015
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 5500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Intel HD Graphics 5500
HD Graphics 5500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 22 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1416 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.