GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) and GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
2021
4 Watt
1.05

RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) by a whopping 2555% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1059184
Place by popularitynot in top-10045
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.76
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGen. 11GA107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179
Current priceno data$204 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162304
Core clock speed250 MHzno data
Boost clock speed850 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data105.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data14 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data168.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
CUDAno data8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5
−2500%
130−140
+2500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Hitman 3 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2208%
300−310
+2208%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2525%
210−220
+2525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−2536%
290−300
+2536%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Hitman 3 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2208%
300−310
+2208%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2525%
210−220
+2525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−2536%
290−300
+2536%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2208%
300−310
+2208%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2525%
210−220
+2525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−2536%
290−300
+2536%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

This is how UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) and RTX 3050 6 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6 GB is 2500% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.05 27.88
Recency 11 January 2021 2 February 2024
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 70 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 417 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.