Radeon 820M vs UHD Graphics 770
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics 770 with Radeon 820M, including specs and performance data.
Graphics 770 outperforms 820M by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 641 | 672 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 29.00 | no data |
| Architecture | Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) | RDNA 3+ (2024) |
| GPU code name | Raptor Lake GT1 | Krackan Point |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 September 2022 (3 years ago) | 2 June 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.8448 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | no data |
| TMUs | 16 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | Ring Bus | no data |
| Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | no data |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | no data |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 7500 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | + |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Motherboard Dependent | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 18
+28.6%
| 14−16
−28.6%
|
| 4K | 13
+30%
| 10−12
−30%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 52
+126%
|
21−24
−126%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 11
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 11
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+14.3%
|
21−24
−14.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 34
+47.8%
|
21−24
−47.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 17
+13.3%
|
14−16
−13.3%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
+16.7%
|
30−33
−16.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+13%
|
21−24
−13%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18
+28.6%
|
14−16
−28.6%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+15.8%
|
18−20
−15.8%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+8.1%
|
60−65
−8.1%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+14.3%
|
21−24
−14.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9
−156%
|
21−24
+156%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100
+11.6%
|
85−90
−11.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11
−20%
|
| Dota 2 | 43
+22.9%
|
35−40
−22.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
+16.7%
|
30−33
−16.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+13%
|
21−24
−13%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 16
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 9
−88.9%
|
16−18
+88.9%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+15.8%
|
18−20
−15.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18
+28.6%
|
14−16
−28.6%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+8.1%
|
60−65
−8.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+14.3%
|
21−24
−14.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11
−20%
|
| Dota 2 | 40
+33.3%
|
30−33
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+13%
|
21−24
−13%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+15.8%
|
18−20
−15.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9
−55.6%
|
14−16
+55.6%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+21.8%
|
55−60
−21.8%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
+16.7%
|
30−33
−16.7%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
+15.8%
|
35−40
−15.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+23.3%
|
30−33
−23.3%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+16.4%
|
55−60
−16.4%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
+16%
|
24−27
−16%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 14
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
This is how UHD Graphics 770 and Radeon 820M compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 770 is 29% faster in 1080p
- UHD Graphics 770 is 30% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 200% faster.
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 820M is 156% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 770 performs better in 48 tests (86%)
- Radeon 820M performs better in 5 tests (9%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.37 | 4.69 |
| Recency | 27 September 2022 | 2 June 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
UHD Graphics 770 has a 14.5% higher aggregate performance score.
Radeon 820M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 820M in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 820M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
