Radeon RX 6650 XT vs UHD Graphics 750

Place in performance ranking	621	71
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.08	29.80
Architecture	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	10 May 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399
Current price	$1454	$465 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6650 XT has 1333% better value for money than UHD Graphics 750.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	2048
Core clock speed	no data	2055 MHz
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	2635 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	176 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	337.3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 750 and Radeon RX 6650 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	17500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	280.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 750 4.48

RX 6650 XT 44.67
+897%

Radeon RX 6650 XT outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 897% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

UHD Graphics 750 1733

RX 6650 XT 17291
+898%

Radeon RX 6650 XT outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 898% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 −907%	141 +907%
1440p	7−8 −929%	72 +929%
4K	3−4 −1167%	38 +1167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −850%	75−80 +850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −2500%	75−80 +2500%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −854%	120−130 +854%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −713%	120−130 +713%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1822%	173 +1822%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −1589%	152 +1589%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −850%	130−140 +850%
Hitman 3	10−11 −1330%	140−150 +1330%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1113%	95−100 +1113%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −700%	70−75 +700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −1367%	176 +1367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −2560%	133 +2560%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −850%	75−80 +850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −2500%	75−80 +2500%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −854%	120−130 +854%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −713%	120−130 +713%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1711%	163 +1711%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −1522%	146 +1522%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −850%	130−140 +850%
Hitman 3	10−11 −1330%	140−150 +1330%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1113%	95−100 +1113%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −1600%	102 +1600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −700%	70−75 +700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −1142%	149 +1142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −1720%	182 +1720%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −2280%	119 +2280%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −850%	75−80 +850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −2500%	75−80 +2500%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −854%	120−130 +854%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1578%	151 +1578%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −1356%	131 +1356%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −850%	130−140 +850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −970%	107 +970%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −1200%	65 +1200%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −986%	75−80 +986%
Hitman 3	8−9 −975%	85−90 +975%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1833%	58 +1833%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1133%	35−40 +1133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1000%	88 +1000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −2350%	45−50 +2350%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1529%	114 +1529%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −3700%	114 +3700%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1800%	95−100 +1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1600%	65−70 +1600%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1333%	40−45 +1333%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1075%	45−50 +1075%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −429%	35−40 +429%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −4100%	42 +4100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	56

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1450%	30−35 +1450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1350%	27−30 +1350%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1000%	55 +1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −757%	60 +757%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −3050%	60−65 +3050%

This is how UHD Graphics 750 and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6650 XT is 907% faster than UHD Graphics 750 in 1080p
RX 6650 XT is 929% faster than UHD Graphics 750 in 1440p
RX 6650 XT is 1167% faster than UHD Graphics 750 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6650 XT is 4100% faster than the UHD Graphics 750.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 6650 XT surpassed UHD Graphics 750 in all 55 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.48	44.67
Recency	30 March 2021	10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	176 Watt