Radeon PRO W7700 vs UHD Graphics 750

Place in the ranking	662	41
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	66.45
Power efficiency	20.55	21.01
Architecture	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	3072
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	499.2
Floating-point processing power	0.6656 TFLOPS	31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	96
TMUs	16	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 750 4.50

PRO W7700 58.28
+1195%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 750 1733

PRO W7700 22456
+1196%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −1150%	150−160 +1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
Battlefield 5	10−12 −1173%	140−150 +1173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1122%	110−120 +1122%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −1150%	150−160 +1150%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −1150%	350−400 +1150%
Hitman 3	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −1067%	350−400 +1067%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −1150%	150−160 +1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −1194%	220−230 +1194%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −1150%	550−600 +1150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −1150%	150−160 +1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
Battlefield 5	10−12 −1173%	140−150 +1173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1122%	110−120 +1122%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −1150%	150−160 +1150%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −1150%	350−400 +1150%
Hitman 3	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −1067%	350−400 +1067%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −1150%	150−160 +1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −1194%	220−230 +1194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −1194%	220−230 +1194%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −1150%	550−600 +1150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −1150%	150−160 +1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1122%	110−120 +1122%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −1150%	350−400 +1150%
Hitman 3	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −1067%	350−400 +1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −1194%	220−230 +1194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −1194%	220−230 +1194%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −1150%	550−600 +1150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−1150%

150−160
+1150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1150%	100−105 +1150%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −1186%	90−95 +1186%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1100%	60−65 +1100%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1150%	100−105 +1150%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1122%	110−120 +1122%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −1150%	350−400 +1150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−1150%

100−105

+1150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Hitman 3	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−1100%

60−65
+1100%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.50	58.28
Recency	30 March 2021	13 November 2023
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	190 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has 1166.7% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 1195.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.