GRID M40 vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 630 with GRID M40, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 630
2017
15 Watt
3.09

GRID M40 outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking723640
Place by popularity29not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.340.40
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 (2017)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-H-GT2GM107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2017 (6 years ago)18 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price$457 $484

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GRID M40 has 18% better value for money than UHD Graphics 630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24384
Core clock speed300 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors189 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4533.06
Floating-point performance460.8 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared5200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data83.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1031.1.126
CUDAno data5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
1440p10
−20%
12−14
+20%
4K7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5
−20%
6−7
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Hitman 3 6
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Hitman 3 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 28
−25%
35−40
+25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and GRID M40 compete in popular games:

  • GRID M40 is 26% faster in 1080p
  • GRID M40 is 20% faster in 1440p
  • GRID M40 is 29% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.09 4.26
Recency 1 October 2017 18 May 2016
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

The GRID M40 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while GRID M40 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GRID M40
GRID M40

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3554 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.