Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile

Place in the ranking	198	383
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	35.38	no data
Power efficiency	16.45	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Xe² (2025)
GPU code name	GP104B	Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2016 (8 years ago)	no data
Launch price (MSRP)	$389.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	8
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	no data
Maximum GPU temperature	94 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	210.6	no data
Floating-point processing power	6.738 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	128	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	8 GB/s	no data
Memory bandwidth	256 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	no data
Multi monitor support	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	3.0	no data
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_2
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 Mobile 28.61
+113%

Arc Graphics 140V 13.41

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 Mobile 11000
+113%

Arc Graphics 140V 5158

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1070 Mobile 22576
+111%

Arc Graphics 140V 10688

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1070 Mobile 34389

Arc Graphics 140V 39055
+13.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1070 Mobile 17237
+81.6%

Arc Graphics 140V 9492

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 Mobile 101041
+90.6%

Arc Graphics 140V 53014

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1070 Mobile 5485
+35.9%

Arc Graphics 140V 4038

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100 +150%	40 −150%
1440p	59 +195%	20 −195%
4K	45 +114%	21−24 −114%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.90	no data
1440p	6.61	no data
4K	8.67	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +22.2%	45 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +119%	27−30 −119%
Elden Ring	95−100 +140%	40−45 −140%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	69 +56.8%	40−45 −56.8%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +48.6%	37 −48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	26 +117%	12−14 −117%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +65.4%	78 −65.4%
Metro Exodus	77 +108%	35−40 −108%
Red Dead Redemption 2	86 +153%	30−35 −153%
Valorant	128 +142%	50−55 −142%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	101 +130%	40−45 −130%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +83.3%	30 −83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	21 +133%	9−10 −133%
Dota 2	62 +40.9%	44 −40.9%
Elden Ring	95−100 +140%	40−45 −140%
Far Cry 5	68 +94.3%	35 −94.3%
Fortnite	137 +80.3%	75−80 −80.3%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +98.5%	65 −98.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	92 +114%	43 −114%
Metro Exodus	60 +62.2%	35−40 −62.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	228 +130%	95−100 −130%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 +14.7%	30−35 −14.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	101 +146%	40−45 −146%
Valorant	79 +49.1%	50−55 −49.1%
World of Tanks	270−280 +50%	180−190 −50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	63 +43.2%	40−45 −43.2%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +120%	25 −120%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +125%	8−9 −125%
Dota 2	95−100 +140%	40−45 −140%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +62.7%	50−55 −62.7%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +126%	57 −126%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80 −23.8%	95−100 +23.8%
Valorant	112 +111%	50−55 −111%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	45−50 +172%	18 −172%
Elden Ring	50−55 +160%	20−22 −160%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 +163%	18−20 −163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +119%	80−85 −119%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24 +100%	12−14 −100%
World of Tanks	180−190 +95.8%	95−100 −95.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	58 +115%	27−30 −115%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +78.6%	14 −78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +120%	5−6 −120%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +181%	30−35 −181%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +144%	30−35 −144%
Metro Exodus	62 +114%	27−30 −114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +159%	16−18 −159%
Valorant	76 +130%	30−35 −130%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%
Dota 2	53 +121%	24−27 −121%
Elden Ring	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Grand Theft Auto V	53 +121%	24−27 −121%
Metro Exodus	21 +133%	9−10 −133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	129 +231%	35−40 −231%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16 +77.8%	9−10 −77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	53 +121%	24−27 −121%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	32 +167%	12−14 −167%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 +150%	2−3 −150%
Dota 2	50−55 +143%	21−24 −143%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +129%	16−18 −129%
Fortnite	39 +160%	14−16 −160%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Valorant	39 +179%	14−16 −179%

This is how GTX 1070 Mobile and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

GTX 1070 Mobile is 150% faster in 1080p
GTX 1070 Mobile is 195% faster in 1440p
GTX 1070 Mobile is 114% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1070 Mobile is 238% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 24% faster.

All in all, in popular games: