Radeon HD 7560D vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal and Radeon HD 7560D, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Titan X Pascal
2016
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
33.69
+2755%

Titan X Pascal outperforms HD 7560D by a whopping 2755% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1611071
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.920.10
Power efficiency9.301.25
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGP102Devastator Lite
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $101

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Titan X Pascal has 6820% better value for money than HD 7560D.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584256
Core clock speed1417 MHz760 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate342.912.16
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS0.3891 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs22416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1251 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 33.69
+2755%
HD 7560D 1.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
+2750%
HD 7560D 457

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Titan X Pascal 35981
+3244%
HD 7560D 1076

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Titan X Pascal 100948
+1961%
HD 7560D 4897

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Titan X Pascal 27349
+3358%
HD 7560D 791

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Titan X Pascal 136891
+2034%
HD 7560D 6415

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD128
+611%
18
−611%
1440p76
+3700%
2−3
−3700%
4K59
+2850%
2−3
−2850%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.37
−66.9%
5.61
+66.9%
1440p15.78
+220%
50.50
−220%
4K20.32
+148%
50.50
−148%
  • HD 7560D has 67% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Titan X Pascal has 220% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Titan X Pascal has 148% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 173
+5667%
3−4
−5667%
Counter-Strike 2 92
+1050%
8−9
−1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+2667%
3−4
−2667%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 127
+4133%
3−4
−4133%
Battlefield 5 153 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 74
+825%
8−9
−825%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+2367%
3−4
−2367%
Far Cry 5 162
+3140%
5−6
−3140%
Fortnite 210
+10400%
2−3
−10400%
Forza Horizon 4 127
+2017%
6−7
−2017%
Forza Horizon 5 124
+3000%
4−5
−3000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+1156%
9−10
−1156%
Valorant 296
+797%
30−35
−797%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 78
+2500%
3−4
−2500%
Battlefield 5 147 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 63
+688%
8−9
−688%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+513%
45
−513%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Dota 2 252
+1475%
16−18
−1475%
Far Cry 5 149
+2880%
5−6
−2880%
Fortnite 199
+9850%
2−3
−9850%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+1917%
6−7
−1917%
Forza Horizon 5 113
+3667%
3−4
−3667%
Grand Theft Auto V 160 0−1
Metro Exodus 96
+9500%
1−2
−9500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+1156%
9−10
−1156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+3580%
5−6
−3580%
Valorant 275
+733%
30−35
−733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 137 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 55
+588%
8−9
−588%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+1800%
3−4
−1800%
Dota 2 232
+1350%
16−18
−1350%
Far Cry 5 140
+3400%
4−5
−3400%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+1767%
6−7
−1767%
Forza Horizon 5 97
+3133%
3−4
−3133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+1033%
9−10
−1033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+1800%
5−6
−1800%
Valorant 181
+448%
30−35
−448%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170
+8400%
2−3
−8400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+3517%
6−7
−3517%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+3333%
3−4
−3333%
Metro Exodus 58
+2800%
2−3
−2800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2400%
7−8
−2400%
Valorant 258
+8500%
3−4
−8500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+4100%
2−3
−4100%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Far Cry 5 101
+10000%
1−2
−10000%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+2767%
3−4
−2767%
Forza Horizon 5 72
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+3900%
2−3
−3900%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 99
+560%
14−16
−560%
Metro Exodus 36
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+3300%
2−3
−3300%
Valorant 257
+4183%
6−7
−4183%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 71
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Counter-Strike 2 8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 17 0−1
Dota 2 160 0−1
Far Cry 5 53
+2550%
2−3
−2550%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+3550%
2−3
−3550%
Forza Horizon 5 45
+4400%
1−2
−4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44
+2100%
2−3
−2100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60
+2900%
2−3
−2900%

This is how Titan X Pascal and HD 7560D compete in popular games:

  • Titan X Pascal is 611% faster in 1080p
  • Titan X Pascal is 3700% faster in 1440p
  • Titan X Pascal is 2850% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Titan X Pascal is 10400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Titan X Pascal surpassed HD 7560D in all 44 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.69 1.18
Recency 2 August 2016 2 October 2012
Chip lithography 16 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 65 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 2755.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7560D, on the other hand, has 284.6% lower power consumption.

The Titan X Pascal is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7560D in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Radeon HD 7560D

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3001 vote

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 145 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or Radeon HD 7560D, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.