GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake-U G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VS
GTX 660 GTX 745 OEM GTX 750 GTX 750 Ti GTX 750 Ti OEM GTX 760 GTX 760 Ti OEM GTX 770 GTX 780 GTX 780 Ti GTX 960 GTX 970

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with GeForce GTX 750 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.03

GTX 750 Ti outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
GTX 750 Ti GTX 750 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking450445
Place by popularitynot in top-10031
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.97
Power efficiencyno data11.76
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGM107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)18 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96640
Core clock speedno data1020 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1085 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt
Texture fill rateno data43.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.389 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data5.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data86.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
3D Vision Live-+
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 10.03
GTX 750 Ti 10.11
+0.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
+16.4%
GTX 750 Ti 4294

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−4%
52
+4%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.87

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−1.5%
65−70
+1.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−1.5%
65−70
+1.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−1.5%
65−70
+1.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−4.8%
40−45
+4.8%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GTX 750 Ti compete in popular games:

  • GTX 750 Ti is 4% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 750 Ti is 14% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 750 Ti is ahead in 19 tests (26%)
  • there's a draw in 53 tests (74%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.03 10.11
Recency 15 August 2020 18 February 2014
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 750 Ti, on the other hand, has a 0.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
R9 M390 Radeon R9 M390
GTX 750 Ti GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
GTX 570 GeForce GTX 570
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
RTX 2080 Super Mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
vs
RTX 4000 Ada Generation RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
vs
RX 7900 XT Radeon RX 7900 XT
RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
vs
RTX 2050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
RTX 2070 Super Mobile GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
vs
RTX 4500 Ada Generation RTX 4500 Ada Generation
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G1
vs
HD 8280 Mobile IGP Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP
Graphics 512SP Radeon Graphics 512SP
vs
Arc Pro A60 Arc Pro A60
HD 8280 Mobile IGP Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Playstation 3 GPU 65nm Playstation 3 GPU 65nm
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
RX Vega 11 Embedded Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
vs
Arc A310 Arc A310

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 6471 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.