Radeon Pro 570 vs Tesla M2090

Place in performance ranking	433	308
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.56	12.94
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GF110	Polaris 20
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	25 July 2011 (12 years ago)	5 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price	$1844	$356

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro 570 has 2211% better value for money than Tesla M2090.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	1792
Core clock speed	651 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1105 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	41.66	123.8
Floating-point performance	1,331.2 gflops	3,584 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla M2090 and Radeon Pro 570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	248 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3696 MHz	6780 MHz
Memory bandwidth	177.4 GB/s	217.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.0	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.50	16.41
Recency	25 July 2011	5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	120 Watt