Quadro 4000M vs Tesla M2090

Place in performance ranking	433	698
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.56	0.99
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GF110	Fermi
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	25 July 2011 (12 years ago)	22 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449
Current price	$1844	$118 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro 4000M has 77% better value for money than Tesla M2090.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	336
Core clock speed	651 MHz	475 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	41.66	26.60
Floating-point performance	1,331.2 gflops	638.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla M2090 and Quadro 4000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	248 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3696 MHz	1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	177.4 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.0	2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla M2090 9.50
+182%

Quadro 4000M 3.37

Tesla M2090 outperforms Quadro 4000M by 182% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Tesla M2090 49
+172%

Quadro 4000M 18

Tesla M2090 outperforms Quadro 4000M by 172% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

200−210
+182%

−182%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

+167%

6−7
−167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Battlefield 5	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +167%	14−16 −167%
Hitman 3	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +175%	20−22 −175%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +169%	12−14 −169%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +178%	18−20 −178%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Battlefield 5	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +167%	14−16 −167%
Hitman 3	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +175%	20−22 −175%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +169%	12−14 −169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +178%	18−20 −178%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +167%	14−16 −167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +175%	20−22 −175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +169%	12−14 −169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +178%	18−20 −178%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

+163%

8−9
−163%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Hitman 3	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

+157%

7−8
−157%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%