Tesla M2070 vs Quadro 4000M

Place in the ranking	728	629
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.32	0.10
Power efficiency	2.33	1.50
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GF104	GF100
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 February 2011 (13 years ago)	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	$3,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro 4000M has 220% better value for money than Tesla M2070.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	336	448
Core clock speed	475 MHz	574 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.60	32.14
Floating-point processing power	0.6384 TFLOPS	1.03 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	56	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	248 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	625 MHz	783 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.1	2.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−40.8%

100−110
+40.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

6.32

30.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

−33.3%

8−9
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Hitman 3	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −37.5%	55−60 +37.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Hitman 3	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −37.5%	55−60 +37.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Hitman 3	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −37.5%	55−60 +37.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−25%

10−11

+25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	20−22 −35%	27−30 +35%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
−42.9%

10−11

+42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%