Arc A370M vs Tesla K40m

Place in performance ranking	469	317
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.11	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GK110B	Alchemist
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	22 November 2013 (10 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$7,699	no data
Current price	$744 (0.1x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2880	8
Core clock speed	745 MHz	1550 MHz
Boost clock speed	876 MHz	1550 MHz
Number of transistors	7,080 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	210.2	99.20
Floating-point performance	4,291 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla K40m and Arc A370M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.4 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	3.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla K40m 8.50

Arc A370M 15.80
+85.9%

Arc A370M outperforms Tesla K40m by 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla K40m 3281

Arc A370M 5115
+55.9%

Arc A370M outperforms Tesla K40m by 56% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18−21 −111%	38 +111%
1440p	10−12 −100%	20 +100%
4K	21−24 −90.5%	40 +90.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

−84.8%

85−90
+84.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −71.9%	55−60 +71.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	33 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −76.5%	90−95 +76.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −71.9%	55−60 +71.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	37 −75.7%	65−70 +75.7%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −75.7%	65−70 +75.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −74.4%	75−80 +74.4%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −75.7%	130−140 +75.7%
Hitman 3	30−35 −77.4%	55−60 +77.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −74.6%	110−120 +74.6%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −79.2%	95−100 +79.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −81.8%	80−85 +81.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	74 −75.7%	130−140 +75.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45 −77.8%	80−85 +77.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −71.9%	55−60 +71.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20 −75%	35−40 +75%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −76.5%	90−95 +76.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −71.9%	55−60 +71.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 −80%	45−50 +80%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −75.7%	65−70 +75.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −74.4%	75−80 +74.4%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −75.7%	130−140 +75.7%
Hitman 3	30−35 −77.4%	55−60 +77.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −74.6%	110−120 +74.6%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −79.2%	95−100 +79.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −81.8%	80−85 +81.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	62 −77.4%	110−120 +77.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	53 −79.2%	95−100 +79.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −80%	90−95 +80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −71.9%	55−60 +71.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −71.9%	55−60 +71.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	21 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −75.7%	65−70 +75.7%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −75.7%	130−140 +75.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −74.6%	110−120 +74.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	53 −79.2%	95−100 +79.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 −73.1%	45−50 +73.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	15 −80%	27−30 +80%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−81.8%

80−85
+81.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −77.4%	55−60 +77.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −83.3%	55−60 +83.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −84.2%	35−40 +84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Far Cry 5	29 −72.4%	50−55 +72.4%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −83.3%	55−60 +83.3%
Hitman 3	18−20 −84.2%	35−40 +84.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −71.9%	55−60 +71.9%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	37 −75.7%	65−70 +75.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	11 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−73.1%

45−50
+73.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Hitman 3	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−71.4%

24−27
+71.4%

This is how Tesla K40m and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

Arc A370M is 111% faster in 1080p
Arc A370M is 100% faster in 1440p
Arc A370M is 90% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.50	15.80
Recency	22 November 2013	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	50 Watt