Radeon RX Vega 10 vs Tesla K20c

Place in performance ranking	454	637
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	1.44	2.31
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code name	GK110	Vega Raven Ridge
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	12 November 2012 (11 years ago)	26 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,199	no data
Current price	$591 (0.2x MSRP)	$449

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 10 has 60% better value for money than Tesla K20c.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2496	640
Core clock speed	706 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	7,080 million	4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	146.8	52.00
Floating-point performance	3,524 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Tesla K20c and Radeon RX Vega 10 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	320 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	208.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.5	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

35−40
+106%

−106%

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	8.90	4.24
Recency	12 November 2012	26 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt