Radeon RX 6600 XT vs Quadro K2000

Place in performance ranking	652	78
Place by popularity	not in top-100	93
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.32	48.56
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GK107	Navi 23
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 March 2013 (11 years ago)	30 July 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	$379
Current price	$550 (0.9x MSRP)	$283 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 15075% better value for money than Quadro K2000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2048
Core clock speed	954 MHz	1968 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2589 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt	160 (TGP) Watt
Texture fill rate	30.53	331.4
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	202 mm	190 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	3.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K2000 4.09

RX 6600 XT 42.70
+944%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro K2000 by 944% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K2000 1578

RX 6600 XT 16490
+945%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro K2000 by 945% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	12−14 −967%	128 +967%
1440p	7−8 −971%	75 +971%
4K	3−4 −1267%	41 +1267%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

−1029%

79
+1029%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −957%	70−75 +957%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −975%	129 +975%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −1042%	130−140 +1042%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −975%	85−90 +975%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1014%	78 +1014%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1038%	90−95 +1038%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −950%	100−110 +950%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1021%	150−160 +1021%
Hitman 3	10−11 −980%	108 +980%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −970%	289 +970%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −1080%	110−120 +1080%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −971%	257 +971%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −1100%	120 +1100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −957%	70−75 +957%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −960%	106 +960%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −1042%	130−140 +1042%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −975%	85−90 +975%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −986%	76 +986%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1038%	90−95 +1038%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −950%	100−110 +950%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1021%	150−160 +1021%
Hitman 3	9−10 −944%	94 +944%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −988%	170−180 +988%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −967%	64 +967%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −1061%	209 +1061%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −1000%	176 +1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −1033%	100−110 +1033%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −957%	70−75 +957%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −971%	75 +971%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −975%	85−90 +975%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1050%	69 +1050%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1038%	90−95 +1038%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1021%	150−160 +1021%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1021%	157 +1021%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −1044%	183 +1044%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1000%	99 +1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −1120%	61 +1120%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
−1011%

100−105

+1011%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1086%	80−85 +1086%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1075%	45−50 +1075%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −1020%	56 +1020%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1000%	65−70 +1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1233%	40 +1233%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −950%	105 +950%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1025%	90−95 +1025%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1017%	67 +1017%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −1060%	116 +1060%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −989%	98 +989%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −1080%	118 +1080%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −967%	60−65 +967%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −1000%	44 +1000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−957%

70−75
+957%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −975%	40−45 +975%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1133%	35−40 +1133%
Hitman 3	3−4 −1000%	33 +1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −1233%	40 +1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −980%	54 +980%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1300%	28 +1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1300%	14 +1300%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1150%	24−27 +1150%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1100%	60−65 +1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −1000%	66 +1000%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −960%	53 +960%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −1100%	24 +1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1200%

35−40
+1200%

This is how Quadro K2000 and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6600 XT is 967% faster in 1080p
RX 6600 XT is 971% faster in 1440p
RX 6600 XT is 1267% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.09	42.70
Recency	1 March 2013	30 July 2021
Cost	$599	$379
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt	160 Watt