GeForce GT 220 vs Tahiti
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tahiti and GeForce GT 220, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Tahiti outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 1423% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 468 | 1173 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | GT2xx (2009−2012) |
| GPU code name | Tahiti | GT216 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | no data | 12 October 2009 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $79.99 |
| Current price | $19.81 | $121 (1.5x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 48 |
| CUDA cores | no data | 48 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 625 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,313 million | 486 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 58 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 9.840 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 144 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 6.6" (16.8 cm) |
| Height | no data | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 790 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 25.3 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | VGADVIHDMI |
| Multi monitor support | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | no data | S/PDIF + HDA |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 (1.2) | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | N/A |
| CUDA | no data | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 300−350
+1329%
| 21
−1329%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+1400%
|
3−4
−1400%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 45−50
+1400%
|
3−4
−1400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+1400%
|
3−4
−1400%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
| Hitman 3 | 30−33
+1400%
|
2−3
−1400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 180−190
+1400%
|
12−14
−1400%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 100−105
+1329%
|
7−8
−1329%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 130−140
+1344%
|
9−10
−1344%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 45−50
+1400%
|
3−4
−1400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+1400%
|
3−4
−1400%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
| Hitman 3 | 30−33
+1400%
|
2−3
−1400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 180−190
+1400%
|
12−14
−1400%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 100−105
+1329%
|
7−8
−1329%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+1400%
|
3−4
−1400%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 130−140
+1344%
|
9−10
−1344%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 45−50
+1400%
|
3−4
−1400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+1400%
|
3−4
−1400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 180−190
+1400%
|
12−14
−1400%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 100−105
+1329%
|
7−8
−1329%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+1400%
|
3−4
−1400%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 130−140
+1344%
|
9−10
−1344%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 60−65
+1400%
|
4−5
−1400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
| Hitman 3 | 90−95
+1400%
|
6−7
−1400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 45−50
+1400%
|
3−4
−1400%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
+1400%
|
3−4
−1400%
|
4K
High Preset
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 60−65
+1400%
|
4−5
−1400%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33
+1400%
|
2−3
−1400%
|
This is how Tahiti and GT 220 compete in popular games:
- Tahiti is 1329% faster in 1080p
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
