Radeon Sky 700 vs GeForce GT 220

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1171not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGT216Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2009 (14 years ago)27 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 no data
Current price$121 (1.5x MSRP)$892

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481792
CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed625 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors486 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt225 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate9.840100.8
Floating-point performance144 gflops3,226 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length6.6" (16.8 cm)267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz5500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.3 GB/s176 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsVGADVIHDMI1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI supportno data1
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIF + HDAno data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+no data

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 12 October 2009 27 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 225 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 220 and Radeon Sky 700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220
AMD Radeon Sky 700
Radeon Sky 700

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 659 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Sky 700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.