Quadro FX 770M vs TITAN V

Place in performance ranking	70	1171
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	40.32	no data
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code name	GV100	NB9P-GLM
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 December 2017 (6 years ago)	14 August 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	$527
Current price	$228 (0.1x MSRP)	$387 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V and FX 770M have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	32
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	21,100 million	314 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.6	8.000
Floating-point performance	14,899 gflops	80 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on TITAN V and Quadro FX 770M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-II
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR2 / GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1696 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.4	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	7.0	1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.30
+7672%

FX 770M 0.57

TITAN V outperforms Quadro FX 770M by 7672% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN V 17125
+7684%

FX 770M 220

TITAN V outperforms Quadro FX 770M by 7684% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1440p	152 +15100%	1−2 −15100%
4K	82 +8100%	1−2 −8100%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	44.30	0.57
Recency	7 December 2017	14 August 2008
Cost	$2999	$527
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	12 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	35 Watt