Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs TITAN V

Place in performance ranking	70	397
Place by popularity	not in top-100	16
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	40.25	no data
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GV100	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	7 December 2017 (6 years ago)	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	no data
Current price	$228 (0.1x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	96
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	21,100 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	465.6	no data
Floating-point performance	14,899 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on TITAN V and Iris Xe Graphics G7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	no data
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1696 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	+	no data
CUDA	7.0	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1440p	152 +334%	35−40 −334%
4K	82 +356%	18−20 −356%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +325%	8−9 −325%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +317%	6−7 −317%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +333%	12−14 −333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +350%	10−11 −350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +371%	7−8 −371%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +325%	8−9 −325%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +317%	6−7 −317%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +333%	12−14 −333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +350%	10−11 −350%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +325%	8−9 −325%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +371%	7−8 −371%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +325%	8−9 −325%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +317%	6−7 −317%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +333%	12−14 −333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +320%	5−6 −320%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%