Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs TITAN V CEO Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V CEO Edition with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V CEO Edition
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
38.01
+330%

TITAN V CEO Edition outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 330% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking88450
Place by popularitynot in top-10019
Power efficiency12.01no data
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGV100Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 June 2018 (6 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512096
Core clock speed1200 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1455 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate465.6no data
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPSno data
ROPs128no data
TMUs320no data
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR4
Maximum RAM amount32 GBno data
Memory bus width4096 Bitno data
Memory clock speed848 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.0-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 42 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 38.01 8.83
Recency 21 June 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm

TITAN V CEO Edition has a 330.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN V CEO Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V CEO Edition is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
TITAN V CEO Edition
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
RX 5300 OEM Radeon RX 5300 OEM
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
A100 PCIe A100 PCIe
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
GTX 1650 TU116 GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
Iris Xe Graphics G4 Iris Xe Graphics G4
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G1
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
RX 5300 Radeon RX 5300
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 21 vote

Rate TITAN V CEO Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2705 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V CEO Edition or Iris Xe Graphics G7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.