RTX A5500 vs TITAN RTX

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

TITAN RTX
2018
24 GB GDDR6
48.74

RTX A5500 outperforms TITAN RTX by a moderate 14% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking5737
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.322.63
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTU102GA102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 December 2018 (5 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data
Current price$1035 (0.4x MSRP)$3965

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN RTX has 330% better value for money than RTX A5500.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores460810240
Core clock speed1350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8532.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s768.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 48.74
RTX A5500 55.55
+14%

RTX A5500 outperforms TITAN RTX by 14% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN RTX 18858
RTX A5500 21494
+14%

RTX A5500 outperforms TITAN RTX by 14% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

TITAN RTX 150124
RTX A5500 176840
+17.8%

RTX A5500 outperforms TITAN RTX by 18% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD162
−11.1%
180−190
+11.1%
1440p107
−12.1%
120−130
+12.1%
4K77
−10.4%
85−90
+10.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
−5.8%
110−120
+5.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 104
−5.8%
110−120
+5.8%
Battlefield 5 163
−10.4%
180−190
+10.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 213
−12.7%
240−250
+12.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
Far Cry 5 165
−9.1%
180−190
+9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 135
−11.1%
150−160
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 187
−12.3%
210−220
+12.3%
Hitman 3 222
−12.6%
250−260
+12.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 142
−12.7%
160−170
+12.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 133
−12.8%
150−160
+12.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 174
−9.2%
190−200
+9.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 112
−7.1%
120−130
+7.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
−13.6%
100−105
+13.6%
Battlefield 5 164
−9.8%
180−190
+9.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 180
−11.1%
200−210
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
Far Cry 5 156
−9%
170−180
+9%
Far Cry New Dawn 129
−8.5%
140−150
+8.5%
Forza Horizon 4 186
−12.9%
210−220
+12.9%
Hitman 3 206
−11.7%
230−240
+11.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 118
−10.2%
130−140
+10.2%
Metro Exodus 134
−11.9%
150−160
+11.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 93
−7.5%
100−105
+7.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 165
−9.1%
180−190
+9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 267
−12.4%
300−310
+12.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 97
−13.4%
110−120
+13.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
−12.5%
90−95
+12.5%
Battlefield 5 160
−12.5%
180−190
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
−9%
85−90
+9%
Far Cry 5 146
−9.6%
160−170
+9.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 117
−11.1%
130−140
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 175
−8.6%
190−200
+8.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
−7.9%
150−160
+7.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 86
−10.5%
95−100
+10.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 131
−6.9%
140−150
+6.9%
Hitman 3 145
−10.3%
160−170
+10.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90
−11.1%
100−105
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 85
−11.8%
95−100
+11.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
−11.1%
70−75
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 121
−7.4%
130−140
+7.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
−13.6%
75−80
+13.6%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−13.4%
110−120
+13.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
−13.6%
75−80
+13.6%
Far Cry 5 134
−11.9%
150−160
+11.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 114
−5.3%
120−130
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 157
−8.3%
170−180
+8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−10.4%
85−90
+10.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70
−7.1%
75−80
+7.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
Hitman 3 82
−9.8%
90−95
+9.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 55
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66
−13.6%
75−80
+13.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
−6.8%
110−120
+6.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Battlefield 5 97
−13.4%
110−120
+13.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Far Cry 5 80
−12.5%
90−95
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
−9.8%
90−95
+9.8%
Forza Horizon 4 114
−5.3%
120−130
+5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 43
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%

This is how TITAN RTX and RTX A5500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A5500 is 11% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A5500 is 12% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A5500 is 10% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.74 55.55
Recency 18 December 2018 22 March 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 230 Watt

The RTX A5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the TITAN RTX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
NVIDIA RTX A5500
RTX A5500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 798 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 42 votes

Rate RTX A5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.