Quadro P1000 vs T1200 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with Quadro P1000, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
19.96
+73%

T1200 Mobile outperforms Quadro P1000 by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking260384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.26
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)1 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$375
Current priceno data$301 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024640
Core clock speed855 MHz1493 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz1519 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data59.20
Floating-point performanceno data1,894 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on T1200 Mobile and Quadro P1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz6008 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.19 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.2
CUDAno data6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 19.96
+73%
Quadro P1000 11.54

T1200 Mobile outperforms Quadro P1000 by 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T1200 Mobile 14387
+140%
Quadro P1000 6001

T1200 Mobile outperforms Quadro P1000 by 140% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T1200 Mobile 44135
+82.1%
Quadro P1000 24240

T1200 Mobile outperforms Quadro P1000 by 82% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T1200 Mobile 10134
+112%
Quadro P1000 4787

T1200 Mobile outperforms Quadro P1000 by 112% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T1200 Mobile 50827
+65.4%
Quadro P1000 30721

T1200 Mobile outperforms Quadro P1000 by 65% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+37.2%
43
−37.2%
1440p34
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
4K109
+81.7%
60−65
−81.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47 no data
Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hitman 3 35−40 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 109 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 89 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 54 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28 no data
Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hitman 3 20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 63 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 19 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 41 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 12 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data

This is how T1200 Mobile and Quadro P1000 compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 37% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 89% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 82% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.96 11.54
Recency 12 April 2021 1 February 2017
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 40 Watt

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro P1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 486 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.