Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs P1000

Place in performance ranking	384	134
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.29	11.56
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GP107	N19E-Q5 MAX-Q
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 February 2017 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$375	no data
Current price	$301 (0.8x MSRP)	$2130

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 5000 Max-Q has 59% better value for money than Quadro P1000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	3072
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	600 - 930 MHz
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz	1350 - 1455 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	80 - 90 Watt
Texture fill rate	59.20	259.2
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P1000 and Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P1000 11.53

RTX 5000 Max-Q 35.31
+206%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P1000 4455

RTX 5000 Max-Q 13636
+206%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 206% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P1000 6001

RTX 5000 Max-Q 26465
+341%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 341% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P1000 24240

RTX 5000 Max-Q 53221
+120%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 120% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P1000 4787

RTX 5000 Max-Q 19790
+313%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 313% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P1000 30721

RTX 5000 Max-Q 64768
+111%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 111% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P1000 42

RTX 5000 Max-Q 82
+92.9%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 93% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P1000 87

RTX 5000 Max-Q 123
+41.8%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 42% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P1000 56

RTX 5000 Max-Q 138
+148%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 148% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P1000 54

RTX 5000 Max-Q 124
+129%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 129% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P1000 57

RTX 5000 Max-Q 125
+119%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 119% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P1000 15

RTX 5000 Max-Q 63
+321%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 321% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P1000 27

RTX 5000 Max-Q 97
+252%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 252% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P1000 4

RTX 5000 Max-Q 14
+267%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 267% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P1000 27

RTX 5000 Max-Q 97
+252%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 252% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P1000 42

RTX 5000 Max-Q 87
+106%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 106% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P1000 54

RTX 5000 Max-Q 125
+131%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 131% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P1000 87

RTX 5000 Max-Q 124
+43.4%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 43% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P1000 56

RTX 5000 Max-Q 150
+170%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 170% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P1000 57

RTX 5000 Max-Q 125
+119%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 119% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P1000 15

RTX 5000 Max-Q 64
+331%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 331% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical.

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P1000 3.9

RTX 5000 Max-Q 14.3
+267%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 267% in SPECviewperf 12 - Energy.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P1000 53

RTX 5000 Max-Q 181
+242%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 242% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05.

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Benchmark coverage: 1%

Quadro P1000 53

RTX 5000 Max-Q 184
+248%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by 248% in SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	43 −144%	105 +144%
1440p	21−24 −210%	65 +210%
4K	12−14 −250%	42 +250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−239%

60−65
+239%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −258%	86 +258%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −239%	60−65 +239%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −208%	110−120 +208%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −339%	101 +339%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −239%	60−65 +239%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −189%	75−80 +189%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −178%	85−90 +178%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −148%	130−140 +148%
Hitman 3	21−24 −232%	70−75 +232%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −238%	162 +238%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −289%	144 +289%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −203%	97 +203%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −269%	130−140 +269%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −113%	85 +113%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −225%	78 +225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −239%	60−65 +239%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −208%	110−120 +208%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −304%	93 +304%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −239%	60−65 +239%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −189%	75−80 +189%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −178%	85−90 +178%
Forza Horizon 4	100 −39%	130−140 +39%
Hitman 3	21−24 −232%	70−75 +232%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −196%	140−150 +196%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −214%	116 +214%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −184%	91 +184%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −269%	130−140 +269%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30 −383%	145 +383%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −355%	182 +355%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −133%	56 +133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −239%	60−65 +239%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −191%	67 +191%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −239%	60−65 +239%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −189%	75−80 +189%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −148%	130−140 +148%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −125%	108 +125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −269%	130−140 +269%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 −419%	83 +419%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −27.5%	51 +27.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−166%

85
+166%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −205%	65−70 +205%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −425%	105 +425%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −336%	48 +336%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −375%	35−40 +375%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −343%	62 +343%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −311%	74 +311%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −232%	70−75 +232%
Hitman 3	14−16 −221%	45−50 +221%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −246%	83 +246%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −306%	73 +306%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −394%	80−85 +394%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −345%	45−50 +345%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −517%	37 +517%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−242%

65
+242%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −218%	35−40 +218%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −263%	27−30 +263%
Hitman 3	7−8 −314%	27−30 +314%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −267%	40−45 +267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −417%	31 +417%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −456%	50 +456%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −343%	31 +343%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −440%	27 +440%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −227%	45−50 +227%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −283%	46 +283%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −291%	43 +291%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −425%	21 +425%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−209%

34
+209%

This is how Quadro P1000 and RTX 5000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Max-Q is 144% faster in 1080p
RTX 5000 Max-Q is 210% faster in 1440p
RTX 5000 Max-Q is 250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5000 Max-Q is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 5000 Max-Q surpassed Quadro P1000 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.53	35.31
Recency	1 February 2017	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	80 Watt