GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs Radeon Vega 7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Vega 7 and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vega 7
2021
45 Watt
6.72

RTX 5050 Mobile outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 486% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking584116
Place by popularity15not in top-100
Power efficiency11.3860.05
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameCezanneGB207
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 April 2021 (4 years ago)24 June 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4482560
Core clock speed300 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate53.20201.6
Floating-point processing power1.702 TFLOPS12.9 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−465%
130−140
+465%
1440p28
−471%
160−170
+471%
4K18
−456%
100−110
+456%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−541%
210−220
+541%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−417%
90−95
+417%
God of War 14
−593%
95−100
+593%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 28
−379%
130−140
+379%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−541%
210−220
+541%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−564%
90−95
+564%
Far Cry 5 20
−535%
120−130
+535%
Fortnite 63
−171%
170−180
+171%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−314%
150−160
+314%
Forza Horizon 5 24
−417%
120−130
+417%
God of War 12
−708%
95−100
+708%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−520%
150−160
+520%
Valorant 70−75
−211%
230−240
+211%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 23
−483%
130−140
+483%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−541%
210−220
+541%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58
−379%
270−280
+379%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−830%
90−95
+830%
Far Cry 5 18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Fortnite 27
−533%
170−180
+533%
Forza Horizon 4 35
−337%
150−160
+337%
Forza Horizon 5 21
−490%
120−130
+490%
God of War 9
−978%
95−100
+978%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−665%
130−140
+665%
Metro Exodus 13
−631%
95−100
+631%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
−574%
150−160
+574%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−647%
140−150
+647%
Valorant 73
−215%
230−240
+215%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21
−538%
130−140
+538%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−933%
90−95
+933%
Far Cry 5 18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−467%
150−160
+467%
God of War 14−16
−593%
95−100
+593%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−520%
150−160
+520%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−992%
140−150
+992%
Valorant 25
−460%
140−150
+460%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14
−1121%
170−180
+1121%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−677%
100−110
+677%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−423%
270−280
+423%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−913%
80−85
+913%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−743%
55−60
+743%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−475%
230−240
+475%
Valorant 48
−444%
260−270
+444%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−677%
100−110
+677%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−840%
45−50
+840%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−646%
95−100
+646%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−613%
110−120
+613%
God of War 7−8
−643%
50−55
+643%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−744%
75−80
+744%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−657%
100−110
+657%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−378%
85−90
+378%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1180%
60−65
+1180%
Valorant 25
−868%
240−250
+868%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−950%
60−65
+950%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−783%
50−55
+783%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−591%
75−80
+591%
God of War 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−643%
50−55
+643%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how Vega 7 and RTX 5050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5050 Mobile is 465% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5050 Mobile is 471% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5050 Mobile is 456% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5050 Mobile is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5050 Mobile is ahead in 58 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.72 39.41
Recency 13 April 2021 24 June 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 50 Watt

Vega 7 has 11.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 5050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 486.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2974 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 80 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 7 or GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.