Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

VS
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-4 GRID RTX T10-8 GRID RTX T10-16 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 with Quadro RTX 6000, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL / 870
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
13.65

RTX 6000 outperforms RX Vega M GL / 870 by a whopping 251% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega M GL / 870 RX Vega M GL / 870
RTX 6000 RTX 6000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38573
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.00
Power efficiency14.5812.77
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega Kaby Lake-GTU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2018 (7 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12804608
Core clock speed931 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rateno data509.8
Floating-point processing powerno data16.31 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−249%
150−160
+249%
1440p28
−239%
95−100
+239%
4K14
−221%
45−50
+221%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data41.99
1440pno data66.31
4Kno data139.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−248%
80−85
+248%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
Battlefield 5 62
−239%
210−220
+239%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−248%
80−85
+248%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%
Far Cry 5 42
−233%
140−150
+233%
Fortnite 86
−249%
300−310
+249%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−245%
190−200
+245%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−240%
160−170
+240%
Valorant 110−120
−215%
350−400
+215%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
Battlefield 5 52
−246%
180−190
+246%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−248%
80−85
+248%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−231%
600−650
+231%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%
Dota 2 85−90
−241%
290−300
+241%
Far Cry 5 39
−233%
130−140
+233%
Fortnite 56
−239%
190−200
+239%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−245%
190−200
+245%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
−241%
140−150
+241%
Metro Exodus 24
−233%
80−85
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−240%
160−170
+240%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
−241%
140−150
+241%
Valorant 110−120
−215%
350−400
+215%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 48
−233%
160−170
+233%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−248%
80−85
+248%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%
Dota 2 85−90
−241%
290−300
+241%
Far Cry 5 36
−233%
120−130
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−245%
190−200
+245%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−240%
160−170
+240%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−233%
80−85
+233%
Valorant 110−120
−215%
350−400
+215%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 38
−242%
130−140
+242%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−209%
300−310
+209%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%
Metro Exodus 14
−221%
45−50
+221%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 62
−239%
210−220
+239%
Valorant 130−140
−228%
450−500
+228%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 34
−224%
110−120
+224%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Far Cry 5 24
−233%
80−85
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−248%
80−85
+248%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24
−233%
80−85
+233%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
−245%
100−105
+245%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−221%
45−50
+221%
Valorant 70−75
−243%
240−250
+243%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16
−244%
55−60
+244%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Dota 2 45−50
−240%
160−170
+240%
Far Cry 5 12
−233%
40−45
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−241%
75−80
+241%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
−233%
30−33
+233%

This is how RX Vega M GL / 870 and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 is 249% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 is 239% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 is 221% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.65 47.89
Recency 7 January 2018 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 260 Watt

RX Vega M GL / 870 has 300% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000, on the other hand, has a 250.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
vs
A10G A10G
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
GTX 1070 GDDR5X NVIDIA GTX 1070 GDDR5X
vs
UHD Graphics 630 Graphics 630
P520 Max-Q NVIDIA P520 Max-Q
vs
UHD Graphics 630 Graphics 630
Tesla C1080 Tesla C1080
vs
E9173 PCIe PCIe
Tegra X1 Tegra X1
vs
NX-SoC SoC
Jetson Nano Jetson Nano
vs
NX-SoC SoC
RTX 2060 NVIDIA RTX 2060
vs
530X Mobile 530X Mobile
Pro Vega 16 AMD Pro Vega 16
vs
RX Vega 20 Vega 20
RX 6600 XT AMD RX 6600 XT
vs
R9 A375 A375
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
Quadro 4100 4100
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
vs
R7 Mobile Graphics Mobile Graphics

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.5 118 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 134 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 or Quadro RTX 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.