Tesla T10 16 GB vs Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 430 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 15.03 | no data |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Vega Kaby Lake-G | TU102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 7 January 2018 (7 years ago) | 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 3584 |
| Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 1065 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 18,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 312.5 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 9.999 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 224 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 448 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 56 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 3.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 6 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1575 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 403.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
RX Vega M GL / 870 has 130.8% lower power consumption.
Tesla T10 16 GB, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 and Tesla T10 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla T10 16 GB is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
