NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

RX Vega M GH
16.92
+10.8%

Radeon RX Vega M GH outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by 11% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking295321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money7.789.08
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVega Kaby Lake-GGP107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years old)3 January 2017 (7 years old)
Current price$1031 $545
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has 17% better value for money than RX Vega M GH.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536768
CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed1063 MHz1493 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate114.277.76
Floating-point performance3,656 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz7 GB/s
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC supportno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Anselno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GH 16.92
+10.8%
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 15.27

Radeon RX Vega M GH outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by 11% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega M GH 6557
+10.8%
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 5918

Radeon RX Vega M GH outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by 11% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega M GH 14302
+48.7%
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 9616

Radeon RX Vega M GH outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by 49% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega M GH 10248
+32.4%
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7741

Radeon RX Vega M GH outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by 32% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega M GH 59162
+17.1%
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 50514

Radeon RX Vega M GH outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by 17% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX Vega M GH 357446
+19.5%
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 299188

Radeon RX Vega M GH outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by 19% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+5.4%
56
−5.4%
1440p38
+52%
25
−52%
4K28
+64.7%
17
−64.7%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
+2.3%
43
−2.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Battlefield 5 81
+37.3%
59
−37.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−6.8%
47
+6.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−6.8%
47
+6.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 55
+19.6%
46
−19.6%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−5.1%
62
+5.1%
Hitman 3 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−17.9%
33
+17.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+20.5%
39
−20.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
−5.7%
37
+5.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Battlefield 5 66
+34.7%
49
−34.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+33.3%
33
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry 5 51
+15.9%
44
−15.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 51
+21.4%
42
−21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+3.5%
57
−3.5%
Hitman 3 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Metro Exodus 32
+68.4%
19
−68.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
+21.2%
33
−21.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+27.7%
47
−27.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
−9.5%
23
+9.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Battlefield 5 60
+42.9%
42
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry 5 47
+17.5%
40
−17.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 47
+23.7%
38
−23.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+37.2%
43
−37.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+30.8%
26
−30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+19%
21
−19%
Hitman 3 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+33.3%
12
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+29.4%
17
−29.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Battlefield 5 43
+48.3%
29
−48.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+7.7%
26
−7.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+18.5%
27
−18.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+200%
4
−200%
Hitman 3 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 11
+57.1%
7
−57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+37.5%
8
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
17
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+8.3%
12
−8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 22
+69.2%
13
−69.2%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

This is how RX Vega M GH and GTX 1050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX Vega M GH is 5.4% faster than GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

1440p resolution:

  • RX Vega M GH is 52% faster than GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

4K resolution:

  • RX Vega M GH is 64.7% faster than GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GH is 200% faster than the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 17.9% faster than the RX Vega M GH.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GH is ahead in 36 tests (84%)
  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 6 tests (14%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 16.92 15.27
Recency 7 January 2018 3 January 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 36 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 726 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.