Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon RX Vega 9

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking656not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.64no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeBMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5762048
Core clock speedno data1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data332.8
Floating-point processing powerno data10.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 5 September 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

RX Vega 9 has 366.7% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 9 and Arc Pro B50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 28 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 9 or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.