Iris Plus Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro 5500M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking306not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.28no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 14Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)4 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536512
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate139.233.60
Floating-point processing power4.454 TFLOPS1.075 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs9632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.97

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2019 4 May 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 15 Watt

Pro 5500M has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Plus Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 466.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5500M and Iris Plus Graphics G7. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation card while Iris Plus Graphics G7 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 259 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 49 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.