Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon RX Vega 3
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 831 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 85 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 13.95 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Xe2 (2024) |
| GPU code name | Picasso | BMG-G21 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 January 2019 (6 years ago) | 5 September 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $349 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1001 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | 19,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 12.01 | 332.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.3844 TFLOPS | 10.65 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 16 |
| TMUs | 12 | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
| L2 Cache | no data | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 167 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 January 2019 | 5 September 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 70 Watt |
RX Vega 3 has 366.7% lower power consumption.
Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and Arc Pro B50. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
