Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 3 with Arc Pro B50, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 3
2019
15 Watt
2.60

Pro B50 outperforms 3 by a whopping 1047% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking838194
Place by popularity85not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.43
Power efficiency13.9634.32
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code namePicassoBMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed300 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate12.01332.8
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs12128
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 3 2.60
Arc Pro B50 29.82
+1047%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 3 1149
Samples: 2845
Arc Pro B50 13186
+1048%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−983%
130−140
+983%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.68

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 29
−934%
300−310
+934%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Hogwarts Legacy 8
−1025%
90−95
+1025%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Counter-Strike 2 22
−1036%
250−260
+1036%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Far Cry 5 5
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Fortnite 14
−1043%
160−170
+1043%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%
Forza Horizon 5 9
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
Valorant 45−50
−1011%
500−550
+1011%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Counter-Strike 2 5
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 23
−1030%
260−270
+1030%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Dota 2 21
−1043%
240−250
+1043%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Fortnite 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Metro Exodus 2
−950%
21−24
+950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−983%
65−70
+983%
Valorant 45−50
−1011%
500−550
+1011%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Dota 2 19
−1005%
210−220
+1005%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Valorant 45−50
−1011%
500−550
+1011%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−1000%
220−230
+1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−1025%
270−280
+1025%
Valorant 24−27
−1015%
290−300
+1015%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1025%
180−190
+1025%
Valorant 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

This is how RX Vega 3 and Arc Pro B50 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Pro B50 is 983% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 29.82
Recency 6 January 2019 5 September 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

RX Vega 3 has 366.7% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has a 1046.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro B50 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2205 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.