Arc B580 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Place in the ranking	489	100
Place by popularity	28	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	93.08
Power efficiency	41.29	14.69
Architecture	Vega (2017−2020)	Xe2 (2025)
GPU code name	Vega	BMG-G21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2020 (5 years ago)	16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2560
Core clock speed	no data	2670 MHz
Boost clock speed	2100 MHz	2670 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	427.2
Floating-point processing power	no data	13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	80
TMUs	no data	160
Tensor Cores	no data	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	12 GB
Memory bus width	no data	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	456.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	23 −443%	125 +443%
1440p	17 −306%	69 +306%
4K	9 −378%	43 +378%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	1.99
1440p	no data	3.61
4K	no data	5.79

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	13 −1000%	143 +1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	19 −347%	85−90 +347%
Elden Ring	18 −344%	80−85 +344%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −266%	100−110 +266%
Counter-Strike 2	12 −875%	117 +875%
Cyberpunk 2077	15 −333%	65−70 +333%
Forza Horizon 4	32 −338%	140−150 +338%
Metro Exodus	27 −259%	95−100 +259%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 −139%	75−80 +139%
Valorant	44 −270%	160−170 +270%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −266%	100−110 +266%
Counter-Strike 2	9 −1056%	104 +1056%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 −309%	45−50 +309%
Dota 2	29 −383%	140 +383%
Elden Ring	22 −550%	140−150 +550%
Far Cry 5	30 −130%	69 +130%
Fortnite	50−55 −232%	170−180 +232%
Forza Horizon 4	27 −344%	120−130 +344%
Grand Theft Auto V	19 −347%	85−90 +347%
Metro Exodus	19 −89.5%	36 +89.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	57 −256%	200−210 +256%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12 −558%	75−80 +558%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −437%	140−150 +437%
Valorant	14 −1064%	160−170 +1064%
World of Tanks	48 −481%	270−280 +481%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −266%	100−110 +266%
Counter-Strike 2	8 −1088%	95 +1088%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 −344%	40−45 +344%
Dota 2	48 −338%	210−220 +338%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −161%	95−100 +161%
Forza Horizon 4	23 −335%	100−105 +335%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −186%	200−210 +186%
Valorant	37 −341%	160−170 +341%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	9 −667%	69 +667%
Elden Ring	12 −600%	80−85 +600%
Grand Theft Auto V	9 −344%	40−45 +344%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	22 −332%	95−100 +332%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −486%	40−45 +486%
World of Tanks	21 −1129%	250−260 +1129%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −335%	70−75 +335%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −90.6%	61 +90.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	2 −350%	9−10 +350%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −595%	130−140 +595%
Forza Horizon 4	16 −338%	70−75 +338%
Metro Exodus	17 −412%	85−90 +412%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Valorant	39 −233%	130−140 +233%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −1300%	40−45 +1300%
Dota 2	10 −680%	78 +680%
Elden Ring	6 −567%	40−45 +567%
Grand Theft Auto V	10 −350%	45−50 +350%
Metro Exodus	6 −667%	46 +667%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	13 −915%	130−140 +915%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 −350%	45−50 +350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −500%	45−50 +500%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −1300%	40−45 +1300%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Dota 2	18 −344%	80−85 +344%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −455%	60−65 +455%
Fortnite	9−10 −544%	55−60 +544%
Forza Horizon 4	9 −344%	40−45 +344%
Valorant	9−10 −667%	65−70 +667%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

Arc B580 is 443% faster in 1080p
Arc B580 is 306% faster in 1440p
Arc B580 is 378% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc B580 is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Arc B580 surpassed RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in all 43 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.01	40.60
Recency	7 January 2020	16 January 2025
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	190 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has 1166.7% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 350.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.