FirePro D700 vs Radeon RX Vega 56

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RX Vega 56
2017
8 GB HBM2, 210 Watt
34.33
+148%

Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms FirePro D700 by a whopping 148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking141350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.675.39
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameVegaTahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 August 2017 (6 years ago)18 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data
Current price$224 (0.6x MSRP)$413

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 56 has 395% better value for money than FirePro D700.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842048
Core clock speed1138 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1474 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt274 Watt
Texture fill rate329.5108.8
Floating-point performance10,566 gflops3,482 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm279 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width409.6 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz5480 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s263.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD115
+156%
45−50
−156%
1440p70
+159%
27−30
−159%
4K51
+183%
18−21
−183%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
+157%
30−33
−157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Battlefield 5 164
+152%
65−70
−152%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+153%
30−33
−153%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Far Cry 5 115
+156%
45−50
−156%
Far Cry New Dawn 114
+153%
45−50
−153%
Forza Horizon 4 141
+156%
55−60
−156%
Hitman 3 85−90
+183%
30−33
−183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+150%
50−55
−150%
Metro Exodus 144
+162%
55−60
−162%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+187%
30−33
−187%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+151%
45−50
−151%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70
+159%
27−30
−159%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Battlefield 5 153
+155%
60−65
−155%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+153%
30−33
−153%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+174%
27−30
−174%
Far Cry New Dawn 90
+157%
35−40
−157%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+168%
50−55
−168%
Hitman 3 85−90
+183%
30−33
−183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+150%
50−55
−150%
Metro Exodus 93
+166%
35−40
−166%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+187%
30−33
−187%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43
+169%
16−18
−169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 124
+148%
50−55
−148%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
+189%
18−20
−189%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+153%
30−33
−153%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Far Cry 5 69
+156%
27−30
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 109
+173%
40−45
−173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+150%
50−55
−150%
Metro Exodus 84
+180%
30−33
−180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+174%
27−30
−174%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+187%
30−33
−187%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 98
+180%
35−40
−180%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
+180%
30−33
−180%
Hitman 3 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
+175%
16−18
−175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Far Cry 5 74
+174%
27−30
−174%
Forza Horizon 4 88
+151%
35−40
−151%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+170%
27−30
−170%
Metro Exodus 74
+174%
27−30
−174%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 55−60
+171%
21−24
−171%
Far Cry New Dawn 46
+156%
18−20
−156%
Hitman 3 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
+158%
12−14
−158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+175%
16−18
−175%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
+170%
10−11
−170%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Battlefield 5 55
+162%
21−24
−162%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+181%
21−24
−181%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Metro Exodus 42
+163%
16−18
−163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%

This is how RX Vega 56 and FirePro D700 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 56 is 156% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 56 is 159% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 56 is 183% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.33 13.86
Recency 14 August 2017 18 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 274 Watt

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 56 is a desktop card while FirePro D700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
AMD FirePro D700
FirePro D700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 699 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 34 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.