GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs Radeon RX 7900 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7900 XT and GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7900 XT
2022
20 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
75.17
+130%

RX 7900 XT outperforms RTX 3050 8 GB by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14165
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.7669.36
Power efficiency17.1717.25
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 31GA106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 November 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3050 8 GB has 84% better value for money than RX 7900 XT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores53762560
Core clock speed1387 MHz1552 MHz
Boost clock speed2394 MHz1777 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate804.4142.2
Floating-point processing power51.48 TFLOPS9.098 TFLOPS
ROPs19232
TMUs33680
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Cores8420

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length276 mm242 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount20 GB8 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth800.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7900 XT 75.17
+130%
RTX 3050 8 GB 32.73

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7900 XT 28969
+130%
RTX 3050 8 GB 12612

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD205
+141%
85−90
−141%
1440p133
+142%
55−60
−142%
4K86
+146%
35−40
−146%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.392.93
1440p6.764.53
4K10.457.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 237
+137%
100−105
−137%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+135%
65−70
−135%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+145%
55−60
−145%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+140%
100−105
−140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+140%
50−55
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 212
+136%
90−95
−136%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+136%
50−55
−136%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+131%
80−85
−131%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+144%
100−105
−144%
Hitman 3 120−130
+135%
55−60
−135%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+144%
110−120
−144%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+138%
65−70
−138%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+146%
50−55
−146%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−350
+146%
130−140
−146%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+135%
65−70
−135%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+135%
65−70
−135%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+145%
55−60
−145%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+140%
100−105
−140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+140%
50−55
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 190
+138%
80−85
−138%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+136%
50−55
−136%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+131%
80−85
−131%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+144%
100−105
−144%
Hitman 3 120−130
+135%
55−60
−135%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+144%
110−120
−144%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+138%
65−70
−138%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+146%
50−55
−146%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 492
+134%
210−220
−134%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+131%
70−75
−131%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+135%
65−70
−135%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+135%
65−70
−135%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+145%
55−60
−145%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+140%
50−55
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 179
+139%
75−80
−139%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+136%
50−55
−136%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+144%
100−105
−144%
Hitman 3 120−130
+135%
55−60
−135%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350
+133%
150−160
−133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 424
+136%
180−190
−136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 265
+141%
110−120
−141%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+135%
65−70
−135%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+146%
50−55
−146%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+137%
70−75
−137%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+149%
45−50
−149%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+154%
35−40
−154%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
+143%
40−45
−143%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+134%
35−40
−134%
Cyberpunk 2077 122
+144%
50−55
−144%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+140%
35−40
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+146%
110−120
−146%
Hitman 3 100−110
+142%
45−50
−142%
Horizon Zero Dawn 277
+131%
120−130
−131%
Metro Exodus 141
+135%
60−65
−135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 325
+132%
140−150
−132%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+130%
60−65
−130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+140%
100−105
−140%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+140%
50−55
−140%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+151%
35−40
−151%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Hitman 3 65−70
+148%
27−30
−148%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+138%
95−100
−138%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+144%
50−55
−144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
+145%
65−70
−145%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+133%
27−30
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+154%
24−27
−154%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+148%
21−24
−148%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+150%
24−27
−150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+147%
55−60
−147%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 173
+131%
75−80
−131%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+140%
35−40
−140%

This is how RX 7900 XT and RTX 3050 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XT is 141% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XT is 142% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 XT is 146% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 75.17 32.73
Recency 3 November 2022 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 130 Watt

RX 7900 XT has a 129.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3050 8 GB, on the other hand, has 130.8% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1786 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 12718 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.