GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Radeon RX 7900 XT

Place in the ranking	12	180
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	37.79	no data
Power efficiency	17.30	16.53
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 31	GA106
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	3 November 2022 (2 years ago)	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$899	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5376	2560
Core clock speed	1387 MHz	1515 MHz
Boost clock speed	2394 MHz	1755 MHz
Number of transistors	57,700 million	12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	804.4	140.4
Floating-point processing power	51.48 TFLOPS	8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs	192	32
TMUs	336	80
Tensor Cores	no data	80
Ray Tracing Cores	84	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	276 mm	242 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	20 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	320 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	800.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7900 XT 75.23
+142%

RTX 3050 OEM 31.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7900 XT 28929
+142%

RTX 3050 OEM 11978

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	205 +156%	80−85 −156%
1440p	134 +144%	55−60 −144%
4K	88 +151%	35−40 −151%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.39	no data
1440p	6.71	no data
4K	10.22	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	170−180 +153%	70−75 −153%
Cyberpunk 2077	237 +149%	95−100 −149%
Elden Ring	230 +142%	95−100 −142%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +160%	45−50 −160%
Counter-Strike 2	190 +153%	75−80 −153%
Cyberpunk 2077	106 +165%	40−45 −165%
Forza Horizon 4	580 +142%	240−250 −142%
Metro Exodus	163 +151%	65−70 −151%
Red Dead Redemption 2	130−140 +151%	55−60 −151%
Valorant	400−450 +153%	160−170 −153%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +160%	45−50 −160%
Counter-Strike 2	186 +148%	75−80 −148%
Cyberpunk 2077	95 +171%	35−40 −171%
Dota 2	181 +159%	70−75 −159%
Elden Ring	290−300 +145%	120−130 −145%
Far Cry 5	110 +144%	45−50 −144%
Fortnite	300−350 +151%	120−130 −151%
Forza Horizon 4	492 +146%	200−210 −146%
Grand Theft Auto V	173 +147%	70−75 −147%
Metro Exodus	161 +148%	65−70 −148%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +153%	85−90 −153%
Red Dead Redemption 2	130−140 +151%	55−60 −151%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +149%	70−75 −149%
Valorant	400−450 +153%	160−170 −153%
World of Tanks	270−280 +154%	110−120 −154%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +160%	45−50 −160%
Counter-Strike 2	168 +158%	65−70 −158%
Cyberpunk 2077	89 +154%	35−40 −154%
Dota 2	184 +145%	75−80 −145%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +156%	55−60 −156%
Forza Horizon 4	424 +149%	170−180 −149%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +153%	85−90 −153%
Valorant	400−450 +153%	160−170 −153%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	159 +145%	65−70 −145%
Elden Ring	200−210 +144%	85−90 −144%
Grand Theft Auto V	159 +145%	65−70 −145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +150%	70−75 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +166%	35−40 −166%
World of Tanks	500−550 +146%	210−220 −146%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +149%	35−40 −149%
Counter-Strike 2	124 +148%	50−55 −148%
Cyberpunk 2077	61 +154%	24−27 −154%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +146%	65−70 −146%
Forza Horizon 4	325 +150%	130−140 −150%
Metro Exodus	141 +156%	55−60 −156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +146%	70−75 −146%
Valorant	300−350 +146%	140−150 −146%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	50 +178%	18−20 −178%
Dota 2	175 +150%	70−75 −150%
Elden Ring	110−120 +149%	45−50 −149%
Grand Theft Auto V	175 +150%	70−75 −150%
Metro Exodus	87 +149%	35−40 −149%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +146%	85−90 −146%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +167%	24−27 −167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	175 +150%	70−75 −150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +160%	35−40 −160%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +143%	40−45 −143%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +150%	12−14 −150%
Dota 2	153 +155%	60−65 −155%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +163%	40−45 −163%
Fortnite	95−100 +174%	35−40 −174%
Forza Horizon 4	173 +147%	70−75 −147%
Valorant	200−210 +151%	80−85 −151%

This is how RX 7900 XT and RTX 3050 OEM compete in popular games:

RX 7900 XT is 156% faster in 1080p
RX 7900 XT is 144% faster in 1440p
RX 7900 XT is 151% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	75.23	31.15
Recency	3 November 2022	4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	20 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	130 Watt

RX 7900 XT has a 141.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3050 OEM, on the other hand, has 130.8% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.