Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs PRO W7800

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

PRO W7800
2023
32 GB GDDR6
74.96
+9.4%

PRO W7800 outperforms RX 7900 GRE by a small 9% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.7128.65
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022)RDNA 3
GPU code nameNavi 31Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 April 2023 (1 year ago)27 July 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data
Current price$3907 (1.6x MSRP)$723

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7900 GRE has 229% better value for money than PRO W7800.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44805120
Boost clock speed2499 MHz2245 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate699.7718.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length280 mm276 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7800 74.96
+9.4%
RX 7900 GRE 68.54

PRO W7800 outperforms RX 7900 GRE by 9% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

PRO W7800 29006
+9.4%
RX 7900 GRE 26519

PRO W7800 outperforms RX 7900 GRE by 9% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD220−230
+6.3%
207
−6.3%
1440p140−150
+8.5%
129
−8.5%
4K85−90
+9%
78
−9%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 74.96 68.54
Recency 13 April 2023 27 July 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 GB

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon PRO W7800 and Radeon RX 7900 GRE.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 31 vote

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 315 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.