Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon RX 7600M XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600M XT and Arc Graphics 140V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7600M XT
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
34.22
+158%

RX 7600M XT outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a whopping 158% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking152386
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.55no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488
Core clock speed1280 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2469 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate316.0no data
Floating-point processing power20.23 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600M XT 34.22
+158%
Arc Graphics 140V 13.27

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600M XT 13186
+158%
Arc Graphics 140V 5115

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7600M XT 38039
+256%
Arc Graphics 140V 10688

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 7600M XT 94691
+142%
Arc Graphics 140V 39055

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7600M XT 28686
+202%
Arc Graphics 140V 9492

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7600M XT 155836
+194%
Arc Graphics 140V 53014

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 7600M XT 9555
+137%
Arc Graphics 140V 4038

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD119
+198%
40
−198%
1440p57
+185%
20
−185%
4K33
+175%
12−14
−175%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 131
+162%
50−55
−162%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 139
+178%
50−55
−178%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+180%
35−40
−180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+158%
24−27
−158%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+183%
24−27
−183%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+185%
27−30
−185%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+175%
60−65
−175%
Hitman 3 60−65
+163%
24−27
−163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+168%
50−55
−168%
Metro Exodus 144
+162%
55−60
−162%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+181%
27−30
−181%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+163%
40−45
−163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+185%
40−45
−185%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 237
+163%
90−95
−163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 114
+185%
40−45
−185%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+180%
35−40
−180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+158%
24−27
−158%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+183%
24−27
−183%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+185%
27−30
−185%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+175%
60−65
−175%
Hitman 3 60−65
+163%
24−27
−163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+168%
50−55
−168%
Metro Exodus 142
+158%
55−60
−158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+181%
27−30
−181%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 208
+160%
80−85
−160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+185%
40−45
−185%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85
+183%
30−33
−183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+163%
35−40
−163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+158%
24−27
−158%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+183%
24−27
−183%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+177%
65−70
−177%
Hitman 3 60−65
+163%
24−27
−163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140
+180%
50−55
−180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180
+177%
65−70
−177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+186%
35−40
−186%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60
+186%
21−24
−186%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+181%
27−30
−181%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+171%
21−24
−171%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+158%
24−27
−158%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67
+179%
24−27
−179%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+168%
65−70
−168%
Hitman 3 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Horizon Zero Dawn 106
+165%
40−45
−165%
Metro Exodus 92
+163%
35−40
−163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120
+167%
45−50
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+174%
27−30
−174%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+170%
60−65
−170%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Hitman 3 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+175%
55−60
−175%
Metro Exodus 99
+183%
35−40
−183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+189%
18−20
−189%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 32
+167%
12−14
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
+200%
10−11
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+200%
30−33
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+167%
24−27
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
+175%
8−9
−175%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

This is how RX 7600M XT and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 198% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M XT is 185% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M XT is 175% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.22 13.27
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 3 nm

RX 7600M XT has a 157.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 71 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.