Radeon PRO W7700 vs RX 6750 XT

Place in performance ranking	39	45
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	29.43	23.65
Architecture	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Navi 22	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	$999
Current price	$559 (1x MSRP)	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 XT has 24% better value for money than PRO W7700.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	3072
Core clock speed	2150 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2600 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	416.0	499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	432.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6750 XT 53.60
+2.4%

PRO W7700 52.36

RX 6750 XT outperforms PRO W7700 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6750 XT 20746
+2.4%

PRO W7700 20263

RX 6750 XT outperforms PRO W7700 by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	166 +3.8%	160−170 −3.8%
1440p	93 +3.3%	90−95 −3.3%
4K	53 +6%	50−55 −6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

165
+3.1%

160−170

−3.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +8.8%	80−85 −8.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +3.3%	90−95 −3.3%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +6.2%	130−140 −6.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +3.6%	140−150 −3.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	127 +5.8%	120−130 −5.8%
Far Cry 5	178 +4.7%	170−180 −4.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	150 +7.1%	140−150 −7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +2.7%	150−160 −2.7%
Hitman 3	170−180 +6.9%	160−170 −6.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +8.8%	80−85 −8.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	211 +5.5%	200−210 −5.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	135 +3.8%	130−140 −3.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +8.8%	80−85 −8.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +3.3%	90−95 −3.3%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +6.2%	130−140 −6.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +3.6%	140−150 −3.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	109 +9%	100−105 −9%
Far Cry 5	170 +6.3%	160−170 −6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	145 +3.6%	140−150 −3.6%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +2.7%	150−160 −2.7%
Hitman 3	170−180 +6.9%	160−170 −6.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Metro Exodus	127 +5.8%	120−130 −5.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +8.8%	80−85 −8.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	185 +2.8%	180−190 −2.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	245 +6.5%	230−240 −6.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	125 +4.2%	120−130 −4.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +8.8%	80−85 −8.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +3.3%	90−95 −3.3%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +6.2%	130−140 −6.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	98 +3.2%	95−100 −3.2%
Far Cry 5	158 +5.3%	150−160 −5.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	130 +8.3%	120−130 −8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +2.7%	150−160 −2.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	135 +3.8%	130−140 −3.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	98 +3.2%	95−100 −3.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +4.4%	90−95 −4.4%
Hitman 3	110−120 +10%	100−105 −10%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Metro Exodus	76 +8.6%	70−75 −8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +15%	40−45 −15%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	118 +7.3%	110−120 −7.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +7.3%	55−60 −7.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +5%	100−105 −5%
Cyberpunk 2077	60 +9.1%	55−60 −9.1%
Far Cry 5	141 +8.5%	130−140 −8.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	126 +5%	120−130 −5%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +4.7%	85−90 −4.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	73 +4.3%	70−75 −4.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +10%	50−55 −10%
Hitman 3	60−65 +9.1%	55−60 −9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%
Metro Exodus	47 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60 +9.1%	55−60 −9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	79 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +10%	60−65 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	26 +8.3%	24−27 −8.3%
Far Cry 5	78 +4%	75−80 −4%
Far Cry New Dawn	82 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	41 +2.5%	40−45 −2.5%

This is how RX 6750 XT and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is 3.8% faster than PRO W7700 in 1080p
RX 6750 XT is 3.3% faster than PRO W7700 in 1440p
RX 6750 XT is 6% faster than PRO W7700 in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	53.60	52.36
Recency	3 March 2022	13 November 2023
Cost	$549	$999
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	190 Watt