Radeon PRO W7700 vs RX 6700 XT

Place in performance ranking	46	45
Place by popularity	98	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	23.10	24.74
Architecture	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Navi 22	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	3 March 2021 (3 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$479	$999
Current price	$685 (1.4x MSRP)	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7700 has 7% better value for money than RX 6700 XT.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	3072
Core clock speed	2321 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2581 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	413.0	499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700 XT 51.47

PRO W7700 51.82
+0.7%

PRO W7700 outperforms RX 6700 XT by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6700 XT 19880

PRO W7700 20016
+0.7%

PRO W7700 outperforms RX 6700 XT by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	151 +0.7%	150−160 −0.7%
1440p	86 +1.2%	85−90 −1.2%
4K	50 +0%	50−55 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

119
+8.2%

110−120

−8.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +1.2%	85−90 −1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	169 −0.6%	170−180 +0.6%
Battlefield 5	160−170 +2.5%	160−170 −2.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	99 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +3%	100−105 −3%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +4.2%	120−130 −4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +4.1%	170−180 −4.1%
Hitman 3	138 +6.2%	130−140 −6.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	359 +2.6%	350−400 −2.6%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +7.5%	120−130 −7.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +0.9%	110−120 −0.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	342 +14%	300−310 −14%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +3.6%	110−120 −3.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +1.2%	85−90 −1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	144 +2.9%	140−150 −2.9%
Battlefield 5	160−170 +2.5%	160−170 −2.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	90 +0%	90−95 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +3%	100−105 −3%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +4.2%	120−130 −4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +4.1%	170−180 −4.1%
Hitman 3	111 +0.9%	110−120 −0.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 +1.4%	210−220 −1.4%
Metro Exodus	73 +4.3%	70−75 −4.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +0.9%	110−120 −0.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	281 +0.4%	280−290 −0.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	223 +1.4%	220−230 −1.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +3.6%	110−120 −3.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +1.2%	85−90 −1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	125 +4.2%	120−130 −4.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	85 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +3%	100−105 −3%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +4.1%	170−180 −4.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	193 +1.6%	190−200 −1.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	240 +0%	240−250 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	127 +5.8%	120−130 −5.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	84 +5%	80−85 −5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120
+0.9%

110−120

−0.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +5%	100−105 −5%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +0.8%	120−130 −0.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +3.6%	55−60 −3.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	109 +9%	100−105 −9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	56 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
Far Cry 5	137 +5.4%	130−140 −5.4%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +2.7%	110−120 −2.7%
Hitman 3	83 +3.8%	80−85 −3.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	145 +3.6%	140−150 −3.6%
Metro Exodus	123 +2.5%	120−130 −2.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	173 +1.8%	170−180 −1.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +3.8%	80−85 −3.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	62 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90
+4.7%

85−90

−4.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
Hitman 3	48 +6.7%	45−50 −6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	57 +3.6%	55−60 −3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	48 +6.7%	45−50 −6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +1.3%	75−80 −1.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	83 +3.8%	80−85 −3.8%
Metro Exodus	76 +1.3%	75−80 −1.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35 +0%	35−40 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
+8.9%

45−50

−8.9%

This is how RX 6700 XT and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

RX 6700 XT is 1% faster in 1080p
RX 6700 XT is 1% faster in 1440p
A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	51.47	51.82
Recency	3 March 2021	13 November 2023
Cost	$479	$999
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	190 Watt