Arc A370M vs Radeon RX 6600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600M and Arc A370M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
36.05
+171%

RX 6600M outperforms Arc A370M by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking136386
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.8726.22
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 23DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921024
Core clock speed2068 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate270.699.20
Floating-point processing power8.659 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs11264
Ray Tracing Cores288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600M 36.05
+171%
Arc A370M 13.30

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600M 13861
+171%
Arc A370M 5115

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6600M 31868
+164%
Arc A370M 12090

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6600M 23525
+189%
Arc A370M 8149

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6600M 144612
+306%
Arc A370M 35604

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 6600M 7840
+102%
Arc A370M 3885

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+161%
38
−161%
1440p52
+148%
21
−148%
4K31
−29%
40
+29%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 92
+283%
24−27
−283%
Cyberpunk 2077 110
+139%
46
−139%
Elden Ring 90
+157%
35
−157%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+130%
40−45
−130%
Counter-Strike 2 75
+213%
24−27
−213%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+316%
19
−316%
Forza Horizon 4 216
+192%
74
−192%
Metro Exodus 100
+178%
35−40
−178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+118%
30−35
−118%
Valorant 160
+208%
50−55
−208%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+130%
40−45
−130%
Counter-Strike 2 66
+175%
24−27
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+392%
13
−392%
Dota 2 115
+174%
42
−174%
Elden Ring 113
+183%
40−45
−183%
Far Cry 5 46
+91.7%
24
−91.7%
Fortnite 160−170
+116%
75−80
−116%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+179%
62
−179%
Grand Theft Auto V 116
+300%
29
−300%
Metro Exodus 78
+500%
13
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+96.9%
95−100
−96.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+118%
30−35
−118%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+215%
40−45
−215%
Valorant 140−150
+177%
50−55
−177%
World of Tanks 270−280
+56.7%
170−180
−56.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+130%
40−45
−130%
Counter-Strike 2 49
+104%
24−27
−104%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+391%
11
−391%
Dota 2 104
+57.6%
66
−57.6%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+82.4%
50−55
−82.4%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+189%
53
−189%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+96.9%
95−100
−96.9%
Valorant 144
+177%
50−55
−177%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 61
+455%
11
−455%
Elden Ring 70−75
+255%
20−22
−255%
Grand Theft Auto V 61
+455%
11
−455%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+76.8%
95−100
−76.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
World of Tanks 230−240
+145%
90−95
−145%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+152%
27−30
−152%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+80%
10−11
−80%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+271%
30−35
−271%
Forza Horizon 4 100
+170%
37
−170%
Metro Exodus 85
+204%
27−30
−204%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+265%
16−18
−265%
Valorant 100−110
+230%
30−35
−230%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Dota 2 58
+142%
24−27
−142%
Elden Ring 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+142%
24−27
−142%
Metro Exodus 28
+211%
9−10
−211%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+195%
35−40
−195%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+142%
24−27
−142%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+242%
12−14
−242%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+133%
3−4
−133%
Dota 2 80
+100%
40
−100%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+206%
16−18
−206%
Fortnite 50−55
+233%
14−16
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+189%
18−20
−189%
Valorant 55−60
+307%
14−16
−307%

This is how RX 6600M and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600M is 161% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600M is 148% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A370M is 29% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6600M is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6600M surpassed Arc A370M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.05 13.30
Recency 31 May 2021 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

RX 6600M has a 171.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1014 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 166 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.