UHD Graphics 770 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

RX 6500 XT
2022
8192 MB GDDR6
24.58
+301%

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 301% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking204546
Place by popularity7822
Value for money22.731.26
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)Alder Lake
GPU code nameNavi 24Alder Lake xG
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data
Current price$274 (1.4x MSRP)$878

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6500 XT has 1704% better value for money than UHD Graphics 770.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102432
Core clock speed2610 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2815 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)107 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate180.226.40

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4Ring Bus
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed18000 MHz1550 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.9 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500 XT 24.58
+301%
UHD Graphics 770 6.13

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 301% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6500 XT 9515
+245%
UHD Graphics 770 2761

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 245% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6500 XT 76445
+2597%
UHD Graphics 770 2834

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 2597% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6500 XT 22954
+39.6%
UHD Graphics 770 16443

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 40% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6500 XT 15712
+474%
UHD Graphics 770 2738

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 474% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6500 XT 91909
UHD Graphics 770 179804
+95.6%

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Radeon RX 6500 XT by 96% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65
+282%
17
−282%
1440p30
+329%
7−8
−329%
4K16
+23.1%
13
−23.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 72
+500%
12
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+300%
12−14
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
+292%
13
−292%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+321%
18−20
−321%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+261%
18−20
−261%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+440%
10
−440%
Far Cry 5 102
+500%
17
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 97
+547%
14−16
−547%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+290%
21−24
−290%
Hitman 3 70−75
+289%
19
−289%
Horizon Zero Dawn 76
+443%
14
−443%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+264%
10−12
−264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85
+507%
14−16
−507%
Watch Dogs: Legion 74
+722%
9−10
−722%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+300%
12−14
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
+514%
7−8
−514%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+321%
18−20
−321%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+261%
18−20
−261%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+240%
10−11
−240%
Far Cry 5 92
+475%
16
−475%
Far Cry New Dawn 89
+493%
14−16
−493%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+290%
21−24
−290%
Hitman 3 70−75
+825%
8
−825%
Horizon Zero Dawn 58
+867%
6
−867%
Metro Exodus 52
+940%
5
−940%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+264%
10−12
−264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65
+364%
14−16
−364%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+411%
18
−411%
Watch Dogs: Legion 58
+544%
9−10
−544%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+300%
12−14
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
+343%
7−8
−343%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+321%
18−20
−321%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+200%
10−11
−200%
Far Cry 5 86
+514%
14
−514%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
+447%
14−16
−447%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+290%
21−24
−290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+500%
9
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
+178%
9−10
−178%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Hitman 3 40−45
+310%
10−11
−310%
Horizon Zero Dawn 42
+250%
12−14
−250%
Metro Exodus 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
+300%
9−10
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 23
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+467%
3−4
−467%
Far Cry 5 57
+533%
9−10
−533%
Far Cry New Dawn 57
+714%
7−8
−714%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+467%
9−10
−467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
+1800%
1−2
−1800%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Hitman 3 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
+50%
8−9
−50%
Metro Exodus 11 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+700%
2−3
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+833%
3−4
−833%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
+200%
2−3
−200%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Cyberpunk 2077 4 0−1
Far Cry 5 23
+283%
6−7
−283%
Far Cry New Dawn 20
+150%
8−9
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10
+900%
1−2
−900%

This is how RX 6500 XT and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500 XT is 282% faster than UHD Graphics 770 in 1080p
  • RX 6500 XT is 329% faster than UHD Graphics 770 in 1440p
  • RX 6500 XT is 23.1% faster than UHD Graphics 770 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6500 XT is 2200% faster than the UHD Graphics 770.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6500 XT surpassed UHD Graphics 770 in all 66 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 24.58 6.13
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 107 Watt 15 Watt

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2906 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 970 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.