T400 4 GB vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

Place in the ranking	221	460
Place by popularity	75	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	58.74	no data
Power efficiency	16.03	22.54
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 24	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	19 January 2022 (3 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	384
Core clock speed	2610 MHz	420 MHz
Boost clock speed	2815 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	5,400 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	180.2	34.20
Floating-point processing power	5.765 TFLOPS	1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	64	24
Ray Tracing Cores	16	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2248 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	143.9 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a	3x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500 XT 24.86
+154%

T400 4 GB 9.80

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6500 XT 9558
+154%

T400 4 GB 3769

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	64 +167%	24−27 −167%
1440p	30 +200%	10−12 −200%
4K	16 +167%	6−7 −167%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.11	no data
1440p	6.63	no data
4K	12.44	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	64 +167%	24−27 −167%
Cyberpunk 2077	72 +167%	27−30 −167%
Elden Ring	79 +163%	30−33 −163%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +181%	27−30 −181%
Counter-Strike 2	40 +186%	14−16 −186%
Cyberpunk 2077	27 +170%	10−11 −170%
Forza Horizon 4	128 +156%	50−55 −156%
Metro Exodus	97 +177%	35−40 −177%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +157%	21−24 −157%
Valorant	100−105 +186%	35−40 −186%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +181%	27−30 −181%
Counter-Strike 2	28 +180%	10−11 −180%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 +183%	6−7 −183%
Dota 2	106 +165%	40−45 −165%
Elden Ring	63 +163%	24−27 −163%
Far Cry 5	43 +169%	16−18 −169%
Fortnite	120−130 +178%	45−50 −178%
Forza Horizon 4	107 +168%	40−45 −168%
Grand Theft Auto V	86 +187%	30−33 −187%
Metro Exodus	62 +158%	24−27 −158%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +160%	60−65 −160%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +157%	21−24 −157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +170%	30−33 −170%
Valorant	100−105 +186%	35−40 −186%
World of Tanks	250−260 +157%	100−105 −157%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +181%	27−30 −181%
Counter-Strike 2	24 +167%	9−10 −167%
Cyberpunk 2077	15 +200%	5−6 −200%
Dota 2	110 +175%	40−45 −175%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +181%	27−30 −181%
Forza Horizon 4	83 +177%	30−33 −177%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +160%	60−65 −160%
Valorant	100−105 +186%	35−40 −186%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	37 +164%	14−16 −164%
Elden Ring	19 +171%	7−8 −171%
Grand Theft Auto V	37 +164%	14−16 −164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +169%	65−70 −169%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%
World of Tanks	160−170 +154%	65−70 −154%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +178%	18−20 −178%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +167%	27−30 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	56 +167%	21−24 −167%
Metro Exodus	57 +171%	21−24 −171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +157%	14−16 −157%
Valorant	65−70 +179%	24−27 −179%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7 +250%	2−3 −250%
Dota 2	34 +183%	12−14 −183%
Elden Ring	6 +200%	2−3 −200%
Grand Theft Auto V	34 +183%	12−14 −183%
Metro Exodus	11 +175%	4−5 −175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +181%	27−30 −181%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	34 +183%	12−14 −183%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +175%	8−9 −175%
Cyberpunk 2077	2	0−1
Dota 2	67 +179%	24−27 −179%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +175%	12−14 −175%
Fortnite	30−35 +158%	12−14 −158%
Forza Horizon 4	25 +178%	9−10 −178%
Valorant	30−35 +167%	12−14 −167%

This is how RX 6500 XT and T400 4 GB compete in popular games:

RX 6500 XT is 167% faster in 1080p
RX 6500 XT is 200% faster in 1440p
RX 6500 XT is 167% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.86	9.80
Recency	19 January 2022	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	30 Watt

RX 6500 XT has a 153.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

T400 4 GB, on the other hand, has 256.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the T400 4 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop card while T400 4 GB is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.