GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

Place in performance ranking	218	559
Place by popularity	87	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	58.45	no data
Architecture	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Navi 24	GK104
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)	8 November 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	1536
Core clock speed	2610 MHz	771 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	797 MHz
Number of transistors	5,400 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	122 Watt
Texture fill rate	180.2	102.0
Floating-point performance	5.765 gflops	2.448 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	MXM-B (3.0)
Width	2-slot	MXM Module
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	no data	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	143.9 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.6	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.1.126
CUDA	-	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	67 +272%	18−20 −272%
1440p	33 +313%	8−9 −313%
4K	18 +350%	4−5 −350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

72
+300%

18−20

−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +286%	14−16 −286%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	51 +325%	12−14 −325%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +286%	21−24 −286%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +317%	12−14 −317%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 +286%	14−16 −286%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +307%	14−16 −307%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +306%	16−18 −306%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +314%	35−40 −314%
Hitman 3	50−55 +317%	12−14 −317%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +280%	30−33 −280%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +305%	21−24 −305%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +300%	16−18 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +300%	21−24 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +281%	27−30 −281%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +286%	14−16 −286%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	43 +330%	10−11 −330%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +286%	21−24 −286%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +317%	12−14 −317%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 +278%	9−10 −278%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +307%	14−16 −307%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +306%	16−18 −306%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +314%	35−40 −314%
Hitman 3	50−55 +317%	12−14 −317%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +280%	30−33 −280%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +305%	21−24 −305%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +300%	16−18 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	107 +296%	27−30 −296%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +279%	14−16 −279%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +281%	27−30 −281%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +286%	14−16 −286%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	31 +288%	8−9 −288%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +317%	12−14 −317%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +275%	8−9 −275%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +307%	14−16 −307%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +314%	35−40 −314%
Hitman 3	50−55 +317%	12−14 −317%
Horizon Zero Dawn	92 +283%	24−27 −283%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	83 +295%	21−24 −295%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +286%	14−16 −286%
Watch Dogs: Legion	25 +317%	6−7 −317%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+300%

16−18

−300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +292%	12−14 −292%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +280%	10−11 −280%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	23 +283%	6−7 −283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +300%	7−8 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 +325%	4−5 −325%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +300%	7−8 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +303%	35−40 −303%
Hitman 3	27−30 +314%	7−8 −314%
Horizon Zero Dawn	66 +313%	16−18 −313%
Metro Exodus	57 +307%	14−16 −307%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	56 +300%	14−16 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +300%	35−40 −300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+310%

10−11

−310%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Hitman 3	10 +400%	2−3 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +323%	30−33 −323%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +300%	7−8 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +300%	7−8 −300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6 +500%	1−2 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Cyberpunk 2077	4 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +278%	9−10 −278%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	25 +317%	6−7 −317%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10 +400%	2−3 −400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

+320%

5−6
−320%

This is how RX 6500 XT and GTX 780M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

RX 6500 XT is 272% faster in 1080p
RX 6500 XT is 313% faster in 1440p
RX 6500 XT is 350% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.78	6.69
Recency	19 January 2022	8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	122 Watt

RX 6500 XT has a 270.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 14% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.